Login or register for free to remove ads.
You are here:

Field Experience in Virtual Schools—To Be There Virtually Article

, Iowa State University Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching, United States ; , , University of Canterbury College of Education, New Zealand

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 17, Number 4, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Virtual Schooling (VS) for K-12 school students using distance technologies has increased rapidly in the 21st century with the growth of online learning and virtual schools in more than 44 states in the USA and as e-learning in over 20 clusters of rural schools in New Zealand. Although VS requires a special set of teaching methods, teacher preparation programs are only beginning to include this new mode of schooling and it is important to develop VS field experience. This paper describes a pilot VS field experience within an initial teacher education program in the USA as part of a national project, including multimedia appendices. It enabled future teachers to observe how an exemplary VS school teacher taught her course using blended technologies. Future teachers’ reflections revealed that they had overcome concerns and misperceptions about VS. Key elements identified include mirroring the natural setting using similar technologies, external and internal information gathering, guided observations and engagement with the class. Plans to expand this provision across the USA and in New Zealand provide an international perspective on preparing future teachers for the increasing range of educational opportunities in the 21st first century.

Citation

Compton, L.K.L., Davis, N. & Mackey, J. (2009). Field Experience in Virtual Schools—To Be There Virtually. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 459-477. Chesapeake, VA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education.

Keywords

References

  1. Albion, P., & Gibson, I. (2000). Problem-based learning as a multimedia design framework in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 8(4), 315-326.
  2. Barbour, M., Kinsella, J., Wicks, M., & Toker, S. (2009). Continuing change in a virtual world: Training and retraining teachers [Special issue]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 437-458.
  3. Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402-416.
  4. Browing, R. (2005). V.E.N. Report on elearning communities. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www.virtualeducation.net.nz/docs/reporttoven.doc
  5. Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 73-88.
  6. Charania, A. (2009). Preservice teachers’ perspectives on virtual schooling. Manuscript in preparation.
  7. Compton, L. (2009). The impact of key elements for a successful virtual early field experience: Lessons learned from a case study. Manuscript in preparation.
  8. Compton, L., Follett, J., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Challenging preservice teachers’ preconceptions, misconceptions, and concerns of virtual schooling: A preliminary analysis.
  9. Davis, N. E., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2005). Socio-cultural analysis of two cases of distance learning in secondary education. Education and Information Technologies, 10(3), 249-262.
  10. Davis, N. E., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2007, May). New roles and responsibilities for distance education in K-12 education. Learning and Leading, 34(7), 10-15.
  11. Davis, N. E., & Rose, R. (2007, November). Professional development for virtual schooling and online learning. Research committee issues brief, iNACOL. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://inacol.org/resources/docs/NACOL_PDforVSandOlnLrng.pdf
  12. Dexter, S. (2008). Educational Theory into Practice Software (ETIPS): The learning impact and design of digital cases with formative assessment features. In K. McFerrin
  13. Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston: McGraw Hill. Ferdig, R., Cavanaugh, C., DiPietro, M., Black, E., Mulkey, J., & Dawson, K. (2009). Virtual schooling standards and best practices for teacher education [Special issue]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 479-502.
  14. Ferdig, R. E., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (2006). Video and database-driven web environments for pre-service literacy teaching and learning. In M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 235-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  15. Hannum, W.H., Irvin, M.J., Lei, P.W., & Farmer, T.W. (2008). Effectiveness of using learner-centered principles on student retention in distance education courses in rural schools. Distance Education, 29(3), 211-229.
  16. Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1-2).
  17. Huling, L. (1998). Early field experiences in teacher education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429054)
  18. Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L. (1996). Developing practice through field experiences. In F. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook. Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Lai, K.W., & Pratt, K. (2009). Technological constraints and implementation barriers of using videoconferencing for virtual teaching in New Zealand secondary schools [Special issue]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 503-520.
  20. McIntyre, D. J., Byrd, D. M., & Foxx, S. M. (1996). Field and laboratory experiences. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 171-193). New York: Macmillan.
  21. Morine-Dershimer, G., & Leighfield, K. (1995). Student teaching and field experiences. In L.W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 588-593). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  22. Patrick, S., & Powell, A. (2006). An international perspective of K-12 online learning: A summary of the 2006 NACOL international e-learning survey. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://inacol.org/resources/docs/InternationalSurveyResultsSummaries. Pdf
  23. Reynolds, T., & Greiner, C. (2003). Integrating field experiences in online teacher education. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning. Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer
  24. Roblyer, M. D. (2008). Virtual schooling: Redefining a place called “school.” In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer-Verlag.
  25. Searle, G., & Mandile, F. (2003, November). The virtual schooling service dances to a different tune. Paper presented at the Learning Technologies Conference 2003, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://203.21.12.235/attached_docs/pdf/conf2003_Searle_Mandile_paper.pdf
  26. Watson, J., Gemin, B., & Ryan, J. (2008). Keeping pace with k-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. The International Association for K-12 Online Learning. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www.kpk12.com/downloads/KeepingPace_2008.pdf
  27. Wenmoth, D. (2005, January). The New Zealand correspondence school and the video conferencing cluster schools network. Paper presented at the International Conference on Open Schooling, Goa, India.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.