You are here:

Teacher Candidates Reflect Together on their own Development of TPCK: Edited Teaching Videos as Data for Inquiry PROCEEDINGS

, University of Houston, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This session will explore the use of inquiry methods by teacher education candidates to study their own emerging Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Students develop questions of interest in their own teaching, specifically related to the use of technology, and then collect a variety of data to help them answer their research questions. One key data source is a videotaped teaching episode, which they use to uncover teaching complexities related to the integration of appropriate technology tools with content and pedagogy.

Citation

Pierson, M. (2008). Teacher Candidates Reflect Together on their own Development of TPCK: Edited Teaching Videos as Data for Inquiry. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5305-5309). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Chant, R.H., Heafner, T.L., & Bennett, K.R. (2004). Connecting personal theorizing and action research in preservice teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly.
  2. Dana, N.F., & Silva, D.Y. (2003). The reflective educator's guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Corwin Press.
  3. Dawson, K. (2006). Teacher inquiry: A vehicle to merge prospective teachers’ experience and reflection during curriculumbased, technology-enhanced field experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3).
  4. Dawson, K., & Dana, N.F. (2006). When curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences and teacher inquiry coalesce: An opportunity for conceptual change. British Journal of Educational Technology. Lock., J. (2007). Immigration and integration: ICT in preservice teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial] , 7(1). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol7/iss1/currentpractice/article1.cfm McCurry, D.S. (2000). Technology for critical pedagogy: Beyond self-reflection with video. Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference: Proceedings of SITE 2000 San Diego, California, February 812.
  5. McCurry, D.S. (2002). Multimedia case-based support of experiential teacher education: Critical self reflection and dialogue in multi-cultural contexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 1-5, 2002,
  6. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  7. Murphy, K., Richards, J., Lewis, C., & Carman, E. (2005). Strengthening educational technology in K-8 urban schools and preservice teacher education: A practioner-faculty collaborative process. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 125-139.
  8. National School Reform Faculty. (2006). Retrieved from Harmony Education Center on January 16, 2008: http://www.nsrfharmony.org/faq.html
  9. Pierson, M.E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430.
  10. Price, J.N., & Valli, L. (2005). Preservice teachers becoming agents of change: Pedagogical implications for action research. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(1), 57-72.
  11. Rowley, J.B., & Hart, P.M. (1996). How video case studies can promote reflective dialogue. Educational Leadership, 53, 28-29.
  12. Romano, M. & Schwartz, J. (2005). Exploring technology as a tool for eliciting and encouraging beginning teacher reflection. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5(2), 149-168.
  13. Smith, M.S. (2005). Helping preservice teachers develop habits of inquiry: Can it be done? Reading Research and Instruction, 45(1), 39-68.
  14. Welsch, R.G., & Devlin, P.A. (2007). Developing preservice teachers' reflection: Examining the use of video. Action in Teacher Education, 28(4), 53.
  15. Yerrick, R., Ross, D., & Molebash, P. (2005). Too close for comfort: Real-time science teaching reflections via digital video editing. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(4), 351-375.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Open Educational Resources (OERs) for TPACK Development

    Mark Hofer & Judi Harris, School of Education, College of William & Mary, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 2872–2877

  2. Does the use of the TPACK model enhance digital pedagogies: We don’t understand the present so how can we imagine the future?

    Dorit Maor, Murdoch University

    ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2013 (2013) pp. 531–540

  3. Faculty Development for Technology Integration: Opportunities and Challenges on a Global Scale

    Mark Hofer, College of William & Mary, United States; John Lee, North Carolina State University, United States; David Slykhuis, James Madison University, United States; James Ptaszynski, Microsoft Education, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 770–774

  4. Does the TPACK framework help to design a more engaging learning environment?

    Dorit Maor, Murdoch University, Australia; Pauline Roberts, School of Education, Murdoch University, Australia

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 3498–3504

  5. TPACK as shared, distributed knowledge

    Hæge Nore, Akershus University College, Faculty of Technical and Vocational Teacher Education, Norway; Kirsti L. Engelien, University of Oslo, Department of Teacher Education and School Development, Norway; Monica Johannesen, Oslo University College, Faculty of Education and International Studies, Norway

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3920–3925

  6. Differentiating TPACK Development: Using Learning Activity Types with Inservice and Preservice Teachers

    Mark Hofer & Judith Harris, College of William and Mary, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3857–3864

  7. Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Assessment Rubric

    Judi Harris, College of William & Mary, United States; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States; Mark Hofer, College of William & Mary, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3833–3840

  8. Operationalizing TPACK for Educators: The Activity Types Approach to Technology Integration, Part 2

    Mark Hofer & Judi Harris, School of Education, College of William & Mary, United States; Margaret Blanchard, North Carolina State University, United States; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska - Omaha, United States; Denise Schmidt, Iowa State University, United States; Marcela van Olphen, University of South Florida, United States; Carl Young, North Carolina State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 4103–4106

  9. Operationalizing TPACK for Educators: The Activity Types Approach to Technology Integration, Part 1

    Mark Hofer & Judi Harris, School of Education, College of William & Mary, United States; Margaret Blanchard, North Carolina State University, United States; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska - Omaha, United States; Denise Schmidt, Iowa State University, United States; Marcela van Olphen, University of South Florida, United States; Carl Young, North Carolina State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 4099–4102

  10. Instructional Planning Activity Types as Vehicles for Curriculum-Based TPACK Development

    Judi Harris & Mark Hofer, School of Education, College of William & Mary, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 4087–4095

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.