Do Entry Characteristics of Online Learners Affect Their Satisfaction?
Article
Erman Yukselturk, Middle East Technical University, Turkey
International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This study analyzed learner characteristics that affect satisfaction in an online certificate program under two main purposes. The first purpose was to examine relationships among selected variables (age, gender, educational level, and online course experience), learners' initial perceptions (online technology self-efficacy, online learning readiness, locus of control, and prior knowledge about program courses) and learner satisfaction. The second purpose was to examine program instructors' views about the factors that contribute to the learners' satisfaction in the online certificate program. Sample of the study consisted of four program instructors and 103 voluntary participants who attended this online certificate program in 2005-2007. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect relevant data in this study. Six online questionnaires were used to gather quantitative variables and semistructured interviews were conducted to gather instructors' views. The statistical results indicated that three learner characteristics (educational level, online learning readiness, locus of control) showed a significant relationship with learner satisfaction. Also, the qualitative findings from interviews with instructors generally revealed results complementary to these statistical results.
Citation
Yukselturk, E. (2009). Do Entry Characteristics of Online Learners Affect Their Satisfaction?. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(2), 263-281. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/25266/.
© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Arbaugh, J.B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32–55. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of
- Biner, P.M., Dean, R.S., & Mellinger, A.E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 60–71.
- Biner, P. M., Summers, M., Dean, R. S., Bink, M. L., Anderson, J. L., & Gelder, B. C. (1996). Student satisfaction with interactive telecourses as a function of demographic variables and prior telecourse experience. Distance Education, 17(1), 33–43.
- Cennamo, K. S., & Ross, J. D. (2000). Strategies to support self-directed learning in a web-based course. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 24–28.
- Chang, V. (1996). Students’ perception of the efficacy of web-based learning environment: The emergence of a new learning instrument. Higher education research and development society of Austra las ia. Ava i lab le: http://www.herdsa.org.au/branches/v Ic/Cornerstones/pdf/Chang.PDF. Retrieved December 10, 2003.
- Dag, I. (1991). The reliability and validity study of Rotter’s IE/LOC scale for university students. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 7(26), 10–16.
- Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college elecourse students. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 24–35.
- Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of Asychronos Learning Networks, 6(1). Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol6issue1.htm. Retrieved April 15, 2007.
- Eastmond, D. V. (1994). Adult distance study through computer conferencing. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 128–152.
- Feasely, C., & Olgren, C. (1998). Evaluation for distance education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Fender, D. (1999). Distance education and the safety professional. Professional Safety, 44: 26–29. Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., Shea, P., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 4(2). Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol4issue2.htm. Retrieved April 15, 2007.
- Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
- Gunawardena, C. N., & Duphorne, P. L. (2001). Which learner readiness factors, online features, and CMC related learning approaches are associated with learner satisfaction in computer conferences? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED4456160)
- Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd ed., pp. 355–396. Mahwah, NJ: LEA
- Howland, J., & Moore, J. (2002). Student perceptions as distance learners in Internet-based courses. Distance Education, 23(3), 183–195.
- Isler, V. (1998). Distance Education Experiences of the Middle East Technical University, Paper presented at MEDISAT-EUREKA: Joint Workshop: Internet as a Medium for Innovation and Technology Development in Eastern Mediterranean, Tubitak-Bilten & EU/INCO-DC.
- Jegede, O.J., Fraser, B., & Curtin, D.F. (1995). The development and validation of a distance and open learning environment scale. Educational Technology Reseach and Development, 43(1), 90–94.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
- Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., Shaik, N., & Rivas, N.P. (2000). Comparative analysis of online versus face-to-face instruction. Association for the advancement of computing in education. Available: http://www.aace.org/dl/files/JILR11129.pdf. Retrieved May 7, 2003.
- Kelsey, K. D., Lindner, J. R., & Dooley, K. E. (2002). Agricultural education at a distance: Let’s hear from the students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(4): 25–33.
- Kuchinke, K. P., Aragon, S. R., & Bartlett, K. (2001). Online instructional delivery: Lessons from the instructor’s perspective. Performance Improvement, 40(1), 19–27.
- Lim, C. K. (2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 41–51.
- McVay, M. (2000). Developing a Web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online Bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the Ed.D. Program, Nova Southeastern University, Florida. Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative research. Newbury, CA: Sage. Meyer, K. A. In A.J.
- Miltiadou, M., & Yu, C.H. (2000). Validation of the online technologies self-efficacy survey (OTSES). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED. 445672).
- Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view, 2nd edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
- Mourtos, N.J., & McMullin, K.A. (2001) Comparison of student learning and satisfaction in online and onground engineering courses. Proceedings of the 4th Annual UICEE Conference on
- Parlak, O. (2004). Student Satisfaction Scale on Internet Based Distance Education. Unpublished MS Thesis, Graduate School of Educational Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. Parker, A. (1999). A study of variables that predict dropout from distance education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2). Available: http://www.outreach.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n2/parker/. Retrieved April 15, 2007.
- Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
- Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–26.
- Schwitzer, A.M., Ancis, J.R., & Brown, N. (2001). Promoting student learning and student development at a distance. Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.
- Sener, J., & Humbert, J. (2003) Student satisfaction with online learning: An expanding universe. In J. Bourne & J.C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, pp. 245–260. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
- Song, S. H. (2000). Research issues of motivation in Web-based instruction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1(3), 225–229.
- Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331.
- Taplin, M., & Jegede, O. (2001). Gender differences in factors influencing achievement of distance education students. Open Learning, 16(2), 133–154.
- Thompson, M.M. (1998). Distance learners in higher education. In C.C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes, pp. 9–24. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
- University of New Mexico. (2001). Complete ICES Forms. Available: http://www.unm.edu/cirt/ices/forms.html. Retrieved October 28, 2002.
- Wang, A.Y., & Newlin, M.H. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 137–143.
- Wang, A.Y. & Newlin, M.H. (2002). Predictors of web student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151–163. Wang, X.C., Kanfer, A., Hinn, D.M., & Arvan, L. (2001). Stretching the boundaries: Using ALN to reach on-campus students during an off-campus summer session. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(1). Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue1.htm. Retrieved April 15, 2007.
- Watson, J.C. (2005) Factors influencing the online learning efficacy beliefs of counselors-intraining. Journal of Technology in Counseling, 3(1). Available: http://jtc.colstate.edu/Vol4_1/Watson/Watson.htm. Retrieved April 15, 2007.
- Whipp, J.L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.
- Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007) Predictors for student success in an online course, Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71–83.
- Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeodmer, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References