You are here:

Creating Innovators: Can the Exploration of New Technologies in Teacher Education Programs Develop Early Adopters?
PROCEEDINGS

, , , Arizona State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Antonio, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-61-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper investigates a method for developing innovative tech-savvy teachers through a new assignment in a preservice teacher education course focusing on technology integration. The assignment is meant to support preservice teachers becoming early adopters of new technologies and fulfill the need to incorporate the span of technologies K-12 teachers should be prepared to use. Data collected from focus groups and questionnaire distributed to preservice teacher participants indicate that the assignment was well-received, was effective, and will quite possibly impact preservice teacher attitudes and beliefs as future teachers.

Citation

Williams, M.K., Foulger, T. & Wetzel, K. (2007). Creating Innovators: Can the Exploration of New Technologies in Teacher Education Programs Develop Early Adopters?. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2007--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1733-1738). San Antonio, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 19, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bisplinghoff, B.S., & Allen, J. (1998). Engaging teachers: Creating teaching and researching relationships. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  2. Grabinger, R.S., & Duffield, J. (1996). Problem-Based learning as a rich environment for active learning. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Education Research Association, New York, NY.
  3. Grundy, S. (1998). Research partnerships: Principles and possibilities. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 37-46). New York: Routledge.
  4. Jonassen D.H., Howland, J., Moore, J, & Marra, R.M. (2003). 2nd Edition. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall. Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective.
  5. Kemmis, S., & Wilkinson, M. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 21-36). New York: Routledge.
  6. Krueger, R.A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  7. Moersch, C (2004). The LoTi Connection. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from Learning Quest, Inc. Website: http://www.loticonnection.com/lotilevels.html
  8. Moursund, D. (1997). Www.uoregon.edu/~moursund/dave/LLT-Eds/LLT-V25-1997-98.html
  9. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  10. Peck, K., & Dorricott, D. (1994). Why use technology? Educational Leadership, 51(7), 11-14.
  11. Salomon, G., & Almog, T. (1998). Educational psychology and technology: A matter of reciprocal relations. Teachers College Record, 100 (1), 222-241.
  12. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovation. Teachers College Record, 104 (3), 482-515.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References