You are here:

Prospects for the Use of Mobile Technologies in Science Education
Article

, University of Nicosia, Cyprus

AACE Journal Volume 16, Number 3, ISSN 1065-6901 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

During the past few years there have been great strides in the advancement of technology with the rise of mobile devices leading to an era characterized by the instant access to and mobility of information. Mobile technologies have more recently been used in a variety of educational settings for a variety of purposes and educational goals. Nevertheless, while the claims about the positive impact of the use of mobile technologies in different aspects of education are compelling, data on how these technologies support, for example, the understanding of complex concepts or the development of learning skills that enable students to think critically and problem-solve, are limited. This theoretical article contends that missing, remains a detailed characterization of the accounts and the processes through which mobile technologies mediate learning, and proposes that future research in science education is directed towards: (a) exemplifying the theoretical aspects and the characteristics of design frameworks associated with mobile learning; (b) characterizing rich and complex pedagogical practices that use mobile devices; and (c) sketching the details of the processes by which students come to know through engagement in activities that use mobile technologies.

Citation

Avraamidou, L. (2008). Prospects for the Use of Mobile Technologies in Science Education. AACE Journal, 16(3), 347-365. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
  2. Aikenhead, G.S. (1985). Collective social decision-making: Implications for
  3. Bannasch, S. (1999, Fall). The electronic curator: Using a handheld computer at
  4. Bannasch, S., & Tinker, R. (2002, Winter). Probeware takes a seat in the classroom: Educational impact of probes improves with time and innovation.
  5. Benenson, G. (2001). The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 730-745.
  6. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (2001). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. In D.P. Ely & T. Plomp (Eds), Classic writings on instructional technology (pp. 31-52). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  7. Cajas, F. (2001) The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 715-729.
  8. David, J.L. (1994). Realizing the promise of technology: A policy perspective. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 191-222). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Demana, F., Meagher, M., Abrahamson, L., Owens, D., & Herman, M. (2003).
  10. DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teacher College Press.
  11. Dede, C., & Honan, J. P (2005). Scaling up success: A synthesis of themes and insights. In C.Dede, P.J. Honan, & C.P. Laurence (Eds), Scaling up success (pp. 227-239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  12. Dede, C., & Nelson, R. (2005). Technology as proteus: Digital infrastructures that empower scaling up. In C. Dede, P.J Honan, & C.P Laurence (Eds), Scaling up success (pp. 110-132). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  13. Duschl, R.A., Schweingruber, A., & Shouse, A.W. (2007). Taking science to
  14. Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. & Blumenfeld, P. (2001, April). Creating scalable and systemic technology innovations for urban education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, Washington.
  15. Grant, W.C. (1993). Wireless coyote: A computer-supported field trip. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 57-59.
  16. Herman, J.L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of technology in school reform. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 133-168). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Hsi, S. (2000, April). Using handheld technologies to connect web-based learning to outdoor investigations. Paper presented the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting (NARST). New Orleans, LA.
  18. Hsi, S. (2002, August). The electronic guidebook: A study of user experiences
  19. Hsi, S., Collison, J., & Staudt, C. (2000, April). Bridging web-based science learning with outdoor inquiry using palm computers. Paper presented at
  20. Hurd, P.D. (1989). Science education and the nation’s economy. In A.B. Champagne (Ed.), This year in school science 1989: Scientific literacy (pp. 1540). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  21. Kim, S.H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K.P. (2006). An introduction to current trends
  22. Kirk, H. (2001, April). Accessibility and new technology in the museum. Paper
  23. Presented at Museums and the Web 2001 Conference , Seattle , WA . Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.archimuse.com/mw2001/papers/kirk/kirk.html
  24. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University Press.
  25. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Introduction. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 1-8). London: Routledge.
  26. Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.
  27. McGhee, R., & Kozma, R. (2001, April). New teacher and student roles in the technology-supported classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting
  28. McKenzie, J. (2001). The unwired classroom: Wireless computers come of age.
  29. Metcalf, S. J., & Tinker, R. (2003, March). TEEMSS: Technology enhanced elementary and middle school science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting
  30. Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2005) Literature review in mobile technologies and learning . A report for NESTA futurelab. Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/
  31. National Research Council. (1996). National science educations tandards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  32. Parr, C., Jones, T., & Songer, N. (2004). Evaluation of a handheld data collection interface for science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 233-242.
  33. Quinn, C. (2000, Fall). MLearning: Mobile, wireless, in-your-pocket learning. LiNE Zine. Retrieved October 4, 2007 from http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
  34. Roschelle, J. (2003) Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 260-272.
  35. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  36. Seppala, P., & Alamaki, H. (2003). Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 330-335.
  37. Schmidt, A., & Beigl, M. (1998, July). New challenges of ubiquitous computing
  38. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G.N. (2005). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221-247). London: Sage.
  39. Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B.J., & Marx, R. (2001). Devices are ready-at-hand. Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 15-20.
  40. Spasojevic, M., & Kindberg, T. (2001). A study of an augmented museum experience. HPL-2001-178 Technical Report # 20010726. Retrieved October 4,
  41. Staudt, C. (1999, Fall). Probing untested ground: Young students learn to use handheld computers. @Concord. Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.concord.org/publications/newsletter/1999fall/untested-ground.html
  42. Trinder, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and systems. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 2-24). London: Routledge.
  43. Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Penuel, W. (2006). Using handheld computers to
  44. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 235-243.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. From paper and pencil to mobile phone photo notes-taking among Tanzanian university students: Extent, motives and impact on learning

    Hamisi Mfaume, Margareth Bilinga & Rose Mgaya, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    International Journal of Education and Development using ICT Vol. 14, No. 2 (Oct 05, 2018)

  2. Wherever You Are: There You Can Learn; Mobile Devices for Informal and Lifelong Learning

    Ruby Bohannon, University of North Texas, United States

    Global Learn 2010 (May 17, 2010) pp. 2032–2037

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.