You are here:

Technology for Physics Instruction

, Texas A&M University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 6, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


Although technological innovations have the capability to significantly change how scientific investigations are done and greatly enhance the teaching and learning of science, its use is no more effective than any other resource or innovation when researched-based effective teaching practices are not followed. This paper reviews established guidelines for the effective use of technology in science and mathematics education, and presents several examples of technology products available for physics instruction and research related to their effectiveness.


Bryan, J. (2006). Technology for Physics Instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), 230-245. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved December 10, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Beichner, R. (1990). The impact of video motion analysis on kinematics graph interpretation skills. AAPT Announcer, 26, 86.
  2. Belloni, M., & Christian, W. (2003). Physlets® for quantum mechanics. Computing in Science and Engineering, 5 (1), 90-96.
  3. Belloni, M., Christian, W., & Dancy, M. (2004). Teaching special relativity using Physlets®, The Physics Teacher, 42 (5), 284-290.
  4. Boulter, C., & Buckley, B. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In J. Gilbert& C. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41-57). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  5. Brant, G., Hooper, E., & Sugrue, B. (1991). Which comes first, the simulation or the lecture? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7 (4), 469-481.
  6. Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 385-395.
  7. Bridges, R. (1995). Fitting planetary orbits with a spreadsheet. Physics Education, 30 (5), 266-271.
  8. Brungardt, J., & Zollman, D. (1995). The influence of interactive videodisc instruction using real-time analysis on kinematics graphing skills of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 855-869.
  9. Bryan, J. (2004). Video analysis software and the investigation of the conservation of mechanical energy. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 4 (3). Retrieved March 20, 2006, from
  10. Bryan, J. (2005). Video analysis: Real-world explorations for secondary mathematics. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32(6), 22-24.
  11. Cassady, J. (1998). Student and instructor perceptions of the efficacy of computer-aided lecutres in undergraduate university courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 175-189.
  12. Cherryholmes, C. (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulation: Implications for alternative strategies. The American Behavioral Scientist, 10 , 4-7.
  13. Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86 , 1 7 5-218.
  14. Coleman, A., Holcomb, D., & Rigden, J. (1998). The Introductory Physics Project 1987-1995: What has it accomplished? American Journal of Physics, 66, 212-224.
  15. Cox, A., Belloni, M., Dancy, M., & Christian, W. (2003). Teaching thermodynamics with Physlets® in introductory physics. Physics Education, 38(5), 433-440.
  16. Dancy, M., Christian, W., & Belloni, M. (2002). Teaching with Physlets®: Examples from optics. The Physics Teacher, 40 (8), 494-499.
  17. Escalada, L., & Zollman, D. (1997). An investigation on the effects of using interactive digital video in a physics classroom on student learning and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (5), 467-489.
  18. Field, R. (1995). A spreadsheet simulation for a Young’s double slits experiment. Physics Education, 30 (4), 230-235.
  19. Finkelstein, N., Adams, W., Keller, C., Kohl, P., Perkins, K., Podolefsky, N., Reid, S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1 (1), 010103.
  20. Flick, L. & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow’s science teachers to use technology: Guidelines for science educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1 (1), 39-60.
  21. Garofalo, J., Drier, S., Harper, S., Timmerman, M., & Shockey, T. (2000). Promoting appropriate uses of technology in mathematics teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1 (1), 66-88.
  22. Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. Gilbert& C. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3-17). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  23. Goldberg, F. (1997). Constructing physics understanding in a computer-supported environment. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, 399, 903-911.
  24. Graham, T., & Rowlands, S. (2000). Using computer software in the teaching of mechanics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31 (4), 479-493.
  25. Grayson, D., & McDermott, L. (1996). Use of the computer for research on student thinking in physics. American Journal of Physics, 64, 557-565.
  26. Hasson, B., & Bug, A. (1995). Hands-on and computer simulations. The Physics Teacher, 3 3, 230-236.
  27. Hewson, P. (1985). Diagnosis andre mediation of an alternate conception of velocity using a microcomputer program. American Journal of Physics, 53, 684-690.
  28. Kellogg, D. (1993). Spreadsheet circuitry. Science Teacher, 60 (8), 21-23.
  29. Kinderman, J. (1992), Investigating the Compton effect with a spreadsheet. The Physics Teacher, 30(7), 426-428.
  30. Lederman, N., & Niess, M. (2000). Technology for technology’s sake or for the improvement of teaching and learning? School Science and Mathematics, 100 (7), 345-348.
  31. Lewis, R. (1995). Video introductions to the laboratory: Students positive, grades unchanged. American Journal of Physics, 63 (5), 468-470.
  32. McKinney, W. (1997). The educational use of computer based science simulations: Some lessons from the philosophy of science. Science and Education, 6, 591-603.
  33. Mottmann, J. (1999). Innovations in physics teaching. The Physics Teacher, 37, 7 4-7 7. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2)
  34. National Science Teachers Association. (1990). Science teachers speak out: The NSTA
  35. Otero, V., Johnson, A., & Goldberg, F. (1999). How does the computer facilitate the development of physics knowledge by prospective elementary teachers? Journal of Education, 181 (2), 57-89.
  36. Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster,R. (2006). PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44 (1), 18-23.
  37. Rios, J., & Madhavan, S. (2000). Guide to adopting technology in the physics classroom. The Physics Teacher, 38, 94-9 7.
  38. Schacter, J., & Fagano, C. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 329-343.
  39. Silva, A. (1994). Simulating electrical circuits with an electronic spreadsheet. Computers and Education, 22(4), 345-353.
  40. Steinberg, R. (2000). Computers in teaching science: To simulate or not to simulate? American Journal of Physics Supplement, 68(s7), s37-s41.
  41. Steinberg, M., & Wainwright, C. (1993). Using models to teach electricity– The CASTLE project. The Physics Teacher, 31, 353-3 5 7.
  42. Thornton, R., & Sokoloff, D. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58, 858-867.
  43. United States Department of Education. (1996). Getting America's students ready for the 21st century: Meeting the technology literacy challenge-A report to the nation on technology and education. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from
  44. Wieman, C., & Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming physics education, Physics Today, 5 8(11), 36.
  45. Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (2), 145-160. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2) Technology Resources DataPoint-

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Comparison of Technology Use Between Biology and Physics Teachers in a 1:1 Laptop Environment

    Simon J. Crook, Manjula D. Sharma & Rachel Wilson, University of Sydney, Australia

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 15, No. 2 (June 2015) pp. 126–160

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact