Teachers’ Perceptions of the Impact of Graphing Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom Article
Linda M. Simonsen, Montana State University, United States ; Thomas P. Dick, Oregon State University, United States
JCMST Volume 16, Number 2, ISSN 07319258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards states that at the high school level, graphing calculators must be available to all students at all times. The purpose of this study was to compile teachers' impressions of the barriers and/or incentives associated with the use of graphing calculators on classroom dynamics, curriculum and evaluation, training, support, and overall attitude. HewlettPackard (HP) gave 30 HP48S graphing calculators and an overhead projection device to 36 high schools across the United States. Each school was also given a mandatory 1day inservice, as well as an optional 1week summer workshop, on how to use the calculator and integrate it into the classroom. A year later, each of the schools was contacted and asked if a teacher would participate in a telephone interview which contained primarily openended questions. Twentyseven teachers, representing a wide range of high school mathematics classes, participated in the audiotaped interviews. Recurring themes that emerged from the interviews were organized into these categories: (a) advantages of calculator use, (b) disadvantages of calculator use, (c) classroom dynamics, (d) curriculum and evaluation, and (e) professional support and development. The results demonstrated that the teachers' perceptions of the advantages appeared to be instructionally related, whereas the perceptions of the disadvantages appeared to be primarily logistical in nature. The dynamics of a classroom tended to shift to more discussion, inquiry, and cooperative learning. There was considerable reluctance to deviate from stringent curriculum requirements that are reinforced by standardized tests. This study gave teachers a chance to share their knowledge, experiences, and insights, which in turn will help guide the design of curriculum materials, inservice programs, and support systems to best equip teachers to handle the demands and opportunities that technology presents.
Citation
Simonsen, L.M. & Dick, T.P. (1997). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Impact of Graphing Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2), 239368. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 22, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/20948/.
© 1997 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
 Berenson, S.B., & Stiff, L.V. (1989). Technological tools for instruction and faculty readiness for change. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 9(1), 1118.
 Berenson, S.B., & Stiff, L.V. (1990). Uses of instructional technologies: First year report on change a t a university. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 10(2), 1119.
 Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: A llyn and Bacon.
 Demana, F., & Waits, B.K. (1989). PrecalculusA graphing approach. Reading, MA : AddisonWesley.
 Dick, T., & Shaughnessy, M. (1988). The influence of symbolic /graphing calculators on the perceptions of students and teachers toward mathematics. In M. Behr, C. Lacampagne, & M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of PMENA (pp. 327333). DeKalb ,
 Fey, J.T. (1989). Technology and mathematics education: A survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 237272.
 Heid, M.K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 325.
 Heid, M.K., Sheets, C., & Matras, M.A. (1990). Computerenhanced algebra: New roles and challenges for teachers and students. In T.J. Cooney (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s (pp. 194204). Res ton,
 National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts! A report to the nat ion on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC : National Academy of Sciences.
 Palmiter, J.R. (1991). Effects of computer algebra systems on concept and skill acquisition in calculus. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 266 Simonsen and Dick
 Rich, B. (1991) The effect of the use of graphing calculators on the learning of function concepts in precalculus mathematics (University of Iowa, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 835A.
 Schofield, J.W., & Verban, D. (1988). Computer usage in the teaching of mathematics: Issues that need answers. In D.A. Grouws & T.J. Cooney (Eds.) , Research agenda for mathematics education: Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 169193). Res ton , VA : National Council of
 Steen, L.A. (1988). Who still does math with paper and pencil? In L. Steen (Ed.), Calculus for a new century: A pump, not a filter (pp. 231232).
 Waits, B.K., & Demana, F. (1992). A case against computer symbolic man ipu la t ion in school mathematics today. The Mathematics Teacher, 85(3) , 180183.
 Wiske, M.S., Zodhiates, P., Wilson, B., Gordan, M., Harvey, W., Krensky, L., Lord, B., Watt, M., & Williams, K. (1988). How technology affects teaching (Report No. ETCTR8710). Washington, DC : Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.
Cited By

Conditions Influencing Mathematics Teachers´ Uptake of Digital Tools – a Systematic Literature Review
Marie Utterberg, Johan Lundin & Berner Lindström, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 2016–2029

The Views of Preservice Teachers About the Strengths and Limitations of the Use of Graphing Calculators in Mathematics Instruction
S. Asli OzgunKoca, Wayne State University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 2 (April 2009) pp. 203–227

Integrating Graphing Calculators and Probeware Into Science Methods Courses: Impact on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Confidence and Perspectives on Technology for Learning and Teaching
Irina Lyublinskaya, College of Staten Island, United States; George Zhou, University of Windsor, Canada
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching Vol. 27, No. 2 (April 2008) pp. 163–182

Toward Technology Integration in Mathematics Education: A TechnologyIntegration Course Planning Assignment
Gladis Kersaint, University of South Florida, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 7, No. 4 (December 2007) pp. 256–278

PreService Teachers’ Confidence and Perspectives in Using Graphing Calculator Technology for Learning and Teaching
George (Guoqiang) Zhou & Irina Lyublinskaya, City University of New York, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (Mar 26, 2007) pp. 2663–2672

Research On Graphing Calculators at the Secondary Level: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education
Signe Kastberg, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, United States; Keith Leatham, Brigham Young University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 5, No. 1 (2005) pp. 25–37
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.