You are here:

Teachers’ Perceptions of the Impact of Graphing Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom Article

, Montana State University, United States ; , Oregon State University, United States

JCMST Volume 16, Number 2, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards states that at the high school level, graphing calculators must be available to all students at all times. The purpose of this study was to compile teachers' impressions of the barriers and/or incentives associated with the use of graphing calculators on classroom dynamics, curriculum and evaluation, training, support, and overall attitude. Hewlett-Packard (HP) gave 30 HP-48S graphing calculators and an overhead projection device to 36 high schools across the United States. Each school was also given a mandatory 1-day inservice, as well as an optional 1-week summer workshop, on how to use the calculator and integrate it into the classroom. A year later, each of the schools was contacted and asked if a teacher would participate in a telephone interview which contained primarily open-ended questions. Twentyseven teachers, representing a wide range of high school mathematics classes, participated in the audiotaped interviews. Recurring themes that emerged from the interviews were organized into these categories: (a) advantages of calculator use, (b) disadvantages of calculator use, (c) classroom dynamics, (d) curriculum and evaluation, and (e) professional support and development. The results demonstrated that the teachers' perceptions of the advantages appeared to be instructionally related, whereas the perceptions of the disadvantages appeared to be primarily logistical in nature. The dynamics of a classroom tended to shift to more discussion, inquiry, and cooperative learning. There was considerable reluctance to deviate from stringent curriculum requirements that are reinforced by standardized tests. This study gave teachers a chance to share their knowledge, experiences, and insights, which in turn will help guide the design of curriculum materials, inservice programs, and support systems to best equip teachers to handle the demands and opportunities that technology presents.

Citation

Simonsen, L.M. & Dick, T.P. (1997). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Impact of Graphing Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2), 239-368. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 22, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Berenson, S.B., & Stiff, L.V. (1989). Technological tools for instruction and faculty readiness for change. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 9(1), 11-18.
  2. Berenson, S.B., & Stiff, L.V. (1990). Uses of instructional technologies: First year report on change a t a university. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 10(2), 11-19.
  3. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: A llyn and Bacon.
  4. Demana, F., & Waits, B.K. (1989). Precalculus-A graphing approach. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
  5. Dick, T., & Shaughnessy, M. (1988). The influence of symbolic /graphing calculators on the perceptions of students and teachers toward mathematics. In M. Behr, C. Lacampagne, & M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of PME-NA (pp. 327-333). DeKalb ,
  6. Fey, J.T. (1989). Technology and mathematics education: A survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 237-272.
  7. Heid, M.K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 3-25.
  8. Heid, M.K., Sheets, C., & Matras, M.A. (1990). Computer-enhanced algebra: New roles and challenges for teachers and students. In T.J. Cooney (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s (pp. 194-204). Res ton,
  9. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts! A report to the na-t ion on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC : National Academy of Sciences.
  10. Palmiter, J.R. (1991). Effects of computer algebra systems on concept and skill acquisition in calculus. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 266 Simonsen and Dick
  11. Rich, B. (1991) The effect of the use of graphing calculators on the learning of function concepts in precalculus mathematics (University of Iowa, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 835A.
  12. Schofield, J.W., & Verban, D. (1988). Computer usage in the teaching of mathematics: Issues that need answers. In D.A. Grouws & T.J. Cooney (Eds.) , Research agenda for mathematics education: Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 169-193). Res ton , VA : National Council of
  13. Steen, L.A. (1988). Who still does math with paper and pencil? In L. Steen (Ed.), Calculus for a new century: A pump, not a filter (pp. 231-232).
  14. Waits, B.K., & Demana, F. (1992). A case against computer symbolic ma-n ipu la t ion in school mathematics today. The Mathematics Teacher, 85(3) , 180-183.
  15. Wiske, M.S., Zodhiates, P., Wilson, B., Gordan, M., Harvey, W., Krensky, L., Lord, B., Watt, M., & Williams, K. (1988). How technology affects teaching (Report No. ETC-TR87-10). Washington, DC : Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Conditions Influencing Mathematics Teachers´ Uptake of Digital Tools – a Systematic Literature Review

    Marie Utterberg, Johan Lundin & Berner Lindström, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 2016–2029

  2. The Views of Preservice Teachers About the Strengths and Limitations of the Use of Graphing Calculators in Mathematics Instruction

    S. Asli Ozgun-Koca, Wayne State University, United States

    Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 2 (April 2009) pp. 203–227

  3. Integrating Graphing Calculators and Probeware Into Science Methods Courses: Impact on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Confidence and Perspectives on Technology for Learning and Teaching

    Irina Lyublinskaya, College of Staten Island, United States; George Zhou, University of Windsor, Canada

    Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching Vol. 27, No. 2 (April 2008) pp. 163–182

  4. Toward Technology Integration in Mathematics Education: A Technology-Integration Course Planning Assignment

    Gladis Kersaint, University of South Florida, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 7, No. 4 (December 2007) pp. 256–278

  5. Pre-Service Teachers’ Confidence and Perspectives in Using Graphing Calculator Technology for Learning and Teaching

    George (Guoqiang) Zhou & Irina Lyublinskaya, City University of New York, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (Mar 26, 2007) pp. 2663–2672

  6. Research On Graphing Calculators at the Secondary Level: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education

    Signe Kastberg, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, United States; Keith Leatham, Brigham Young University, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 5, No. 1 (2005) pp. 25–37

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.