You are here:

Cooperative Learning and Technology Article

, , The Ohio State University, United States

JCMST Volume 16, Number 2, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA


Cooperative learning has been used as an educational technique for some time, and recently researchers have been exploring
technology as a mechanism to further this educational method. While some designers have developed cooperative activities around existing software such as spreadsheets,
word processors, and hypermedia/multimedia programs, others have developed new educational software, usually specific to a content or skill area and/or a particular learning episode to support appropriate student interactions. This review describes
several examples of the use of technology to support cooperative learning episodes and examines the underlying design concepts and principles embedded in these applications.


Denning, R. & Smith, P.J. (1997). Cooperative Learning and Technology. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2), 177-200. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 22, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Albanese, M., & Jacobs, R. (1990). Reliability and validity of a procedure to measured iagnos t ic reasoning and problem-solving skills taught in predoctoral orthodontic education. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 13(4), 412-424.
  2. Aronson, E. (1978). The Jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  3. Ballenger, M. (1994). Software for the classroom. Childhood Education. Winter 1993 /94. 118-119.
  4. Becker, H.J. (1993). A model for improving the performance of integrated learning systems: Mixed individualized /group /whole class lessons, cooperative learning, and organizing time for teacher-led remediation of small groups. Computer-Based Integrated Learning Systems. In G.D. Bailey (Ed.) Educational Technology Publications: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  5. Beichner, R.J. (1994). Multimedia editing to promote science learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3(1), 55-70.
  6. Blosser, P.E. (1993). Using Cooperative Learning in Science Education. The Science Outlook: An Informational Bulletin produced by ERIC/ CSMEE. Bricker , L.J. , Tanimoto, S.L. , Rothenberg, A.I. , Hutama , D.C. , & Wong,
  7. Brophy, S.P. (1995). Computer partner in the classroom: Fostering small group problemsolving. Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work. Bloomington , IN: Indiana University.
  8. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.) , Classroom lessons: Integrating cog-n i t ive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA :
  9. Charniak, E., & McDermott, D. (1985). Introduction to artificial intelligence (Chapters 8 and 10). Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
  10. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to 196 Denning and Smith C icoure l , A. (1987). Cognitive and organizational aspects of medical diagnostic reasoning. Discourse Processes, 10(4) , 347-367.
  11. Clancy, W. (1985). Acquiring, representing, and evaluating a competence model of diagnostics tra tegy (Report No. HPP-84-3: STAN-C5-851067): Stanford University, Department of Computer Science. Cognition and Technology Group a t Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1990). Anchored instructionand its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6) , 2-10. Cognition and Technology Group a t Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1992). Anchored instruction in science and mathematics: Theoretical basis, developmental projects and initial research findings. In R. Dusch l & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice. New York: Statem University of New York Press. Cognition and Technology Group a t Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1993). Anchored instructionand situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33 , 52-70.
  12. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
  13. Cousins, J.B., & Ross, J.A. (1993). Improving higher order thinking skills by teaching “with” the computer: A comparative study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(1), 94-115.
  14. Denning, R., & Smith, P.J. (1995). The design and evaluation of a learning environment to teach problem-solving skills to students a t risk for academic failure. Proceedings from the Working Conference on App l ica-t ions of Technology in the Science Classroom. Columbus, OH : The National Center for Science Teaching and Learning.
  15. Duffy, T.M., & Knuth, R.A. (1990). Hypermedia and instruction: Where is the match? In D.H. Johassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hyperme-d ia for learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Dusch l , R. , & Gitomer , D.H. (1995). Moving toward a portfolio culture in science education. In S. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.). Learning science in schools. H i l lsda le , NJ : Erlbaum.
  16. Eberhardt, K.R., & Fligner, M.A. (1977). A comparison of two tests for equality of two proportions. American Statistician, 31 (4), 151-155.
  17. Elstein, A., Shulman, L., & Sprafka, S. (1978). Medical problemsolving-An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Goldman, S.R. , Petrosino, A. , Sherwood, R.D. , Garrison, S. , Hickey, D. ,
  18. Bransford, J.D., Pellegrino, J.W. & CTGV. (1995). Anchoring science instruction in multimedia learning environments. In S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte , & H. Mandl (Eds.) , International perspectives on the design learning environments. H i l lsda le NJ : of technology-supported Lawrence Erlbaum.
  19. Greeno, J.G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 170-218.
  20. Griffin, P. (1992). Socio-Historical concepts applied to observations of computer use. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(4), 269-286.
  21. Gulmans, J., & VanderBerg, R. (1992). A videodisc program for the acquisition of diagnostic skills in health education. (General Report). The Netherlands.
  22. Gustafson, KL., & Tillman, M.H. (1991). Designing the general strategies of instruction. In L.J. Briggs, K.L. Gustafson, & M.H. Tillman (Eds.), Instructional Design Principles and Applications (2nd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  23. Haas, M.E. (1993, January). The Great Solar System Rescue: A highly usable videodisc program. Social Education, 11-12.
  24. Hadderman, M. (1992). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Research Roundup, 8(2).
  25. Haynes, N.M., & Gebreyesus, S. (1992). Cooperative learning: A case for African-American students. School Psychology Reviews, 21(4), 577-585.
  26. Hickey, D.T., Petrosino, A.J., Pellegrino, J.W., Bransford, J.D., Goldman, S.R., Sherwood, R.D., & CTGV (1994). The Mars mission challenge environment: A generative problem-solving school science environment. In S. Vosniadow (Ed.) , Psychological and educational founda-t ions of theno logy-based learning environments (NATO ASO Series). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  27. Jackson, S.L., Stratford, S.J., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (1995). Mode lIt: A cases tudy of learner-centered design software for supporting
  28. Kanselaar, G., & Erkens, G. (1995). A cooperative system for collaborative problemsolving. Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  29. Knight, G.P., & Bohlmeyer, E.M. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement: Methods for assessing causal mechanisms. In S. Sharan (Ed.) , Cooperative learning theory and research (pp. 1-22). New
  30. Male, M. (1993). Cooperative learning and computers in socials tud ies integrating special needs students into general education classrooms. So-c ia l Studies Review, 32(2), 56-62
  31. Mayes, T., Kibby, M., & Anderson, T. (1989). Learning about learning from hypertext. In D.H. Johassen & H. Mandl (Eds.) , Designing hypermedia for learning. Berlin: Springer-Ver lag :
  32. Mergendollar, J., & Packer, M.J. (1989). Cooperative learning in the classroom: A knowledge brief on effective teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322 146)
  33. Mittal, S., Chandrasekaran, B., & Smith, J. (1979). Overview of MDX—A system for medical diagnosis. Proceedings of 3rd Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care, IEEE, 34-46.
  34. National Academy of Sciences (1994). National Science EducationS tandards. Washington, DC : National Academy Press. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  35. Niess, M.L. (1993). Forecast: Changing mathematics curriculum and increasing pressure for higher-level thinking skills. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(2), 129-135.
  36. Peng, Y., & Reggia, J. (1990). Abduc t ive inference models for diagnostic problem-solving. New York: Springer-Ver lag.
  37. Petrosino, A.J. (1995). Mission to mars: An integrated curriculum. Nashville, TN: The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University.
  38. Petrosino, A.J., Secules, T., & Swink, J. (1995, April). Content domain expertise in the learning community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  39. Petrosino, A.J., Sherwood, R.D., Brophy, S.P., Bransford, J.D., & CTGV (1995). The use of cognitive tools to facilitate knowledge construction in macro-context environments: Foundations, design issues and the development of applications. Proceedings from the Working Conference
  40. Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79(1), 37-61.
  41. Raghavan, K., Glaser, R., & Sartoris, M. (1995). MARS: A computer-supported middle-school science curriculum to foster model-based analytica
  42. Reilly, B. (1992). The negotiations of group authorship among second graders using multimedia composing software. Apple classrooms of tomorrow (Report# ACOT-R-14). Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA.
  43. Robbins, H. (1977). A fundamental question of practicals ta t is t ics. AmericanS ta t is tian, 31(4), 97.
  44. Rutherford, J.F., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  45. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). Bringing the classroom into World III. In K. McGilly (Ed.). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press/ Bradford Books.
  46. Sharan, S. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory and research. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  47. Smith, K.A. (1987, February). Educational engineering: Heuristics for improving learning effectiveness and efficiency. Engineering Education, 274-279.
  48. Spitulnik, J., Studer, S., Finkel, E., Gustafson, E., Laczko, J., & Soloway, E. (1995). Toward supporting learners participating in scientifically-informed community discourse. Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work. Bloomington , IN: Indiana University.
  49. Strommen, E. (1995). Cooperative learning. Electronic Learning, 14(6), 25-34.
  50. Suthers, D., & Weiner, A. (1995). Groupware for developing critical discussion skills. Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. Suthers, D. Weiner, A. , Connelly, J. , & Paolucci , M. (1995). Belvedere : Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In Proceedings of the 7 th World Conference on Artificial In te l-l igence in Education. Washington, DC.
  51. Thousand, J.S.(Ed.) (1994). Creativity and collaborative learning: A prac-t ica l guide to empowering students and teachers. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  52. Topping, K. (1988) The Peer Tutoring Handbook Promoting Co-operative Learning. Croom Helm: London and Sydney.
  53. Wiburg, K. (1994). Teaching science with technology: Telecommunications and multimedia. Computing Teacher, 21(7), 6-8.
  54. Winn, W. (1987). Instructional design and intelligent systems: shifts in the

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Mining for Success Online: A Case Study of Challenges in Literacy Education Instruction and Course Transformation from Face-to-face to Online Teaching

    Isaac Larison, Lori Howard & Paula Kaplan, Marshall University, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2013 (Jun 24, 2013) pp. 573–580

  2. Editorial: Examining Social Software in Teacher Education

    Richard E. Ferdig, University of Florida, United States

    Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 15, No. 1 (January 2007) pp. 5–10

  3. A Framework for a Computer System to Support Distributed Cooperative Learning

    Chiung-Hui Chiu, Institute of Computer and Information Education, N, Taiwan

    AACE Journal Vol. 12, No. 1 (January 2004) pp. 9–26

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact