Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam: Methodological Considerations and Challenges for Studying Educators’ Twitter Use
PROCEEDING
Jeffrey Carpenter, Elon University, United States ; Matthew Koehler, K. Bret Staudt Willet, Michigan State University, United States ; Spencer P. Greenhalgh, University of Kentucky, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-37-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Social media have come to play an important role in the professional lives of many educators. Platforms such as Twitter create new spaces in which collegial contact can occur, opening up various avenues for support and development. These spaces, however, can attract users whose behaviors creates challenges for researchers who try to understand and analyze educators’ experiences on social media. In this paper, we describe the kinds of spam that we have encountered in our research specifically on educators’ Twitter use. After summarizing the relevant extant literature, we discuss the benefits and drawbacks of various approaches to dealing with the digital noisiness of educator Twitter spaces. We define a number of practical metrics that researchers can utilize to help identify spam, and describe the process used in one study to identify and remove spam. We conclude by considering implications for educational researchers and teacher educators.
Citation
Carpenter, J., Koehler, M., Staudt Willet, K.B. & Greenhalgh, S.P. (2019). Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam: Methodological Considerations and Challenges for Studying Educators’ Twitter Use. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2702-2711). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/208033/.
© 2019 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Britt, V.G., & Paulus, T. (2016). “Beyond the four walls of my building”: A case study of #Edchat as a community of practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 30, 48–59. Doi:10.1080/08923647.2016.1119609
- Brunton, F. (2013). Spam: A shadow history of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Carpenter, J., Abrams, A., & Dunphy, M. (2016, March). Educators’ professional uses of pinterest. In G. Chamblee& L. Langub (Eds.), Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 19251930). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Carpenter, J.P., & Krutka, D.G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414-434.
- Carpenter, J.P., & Morrison, S.A. (2018). Enhancing teacher education… with Twitter?. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(1), 25-28.
- Chen, C., Zhang, J., Xiang, Y., Zhou, W., & Oliver, J. (2016). Spammers are becoming “smarter” on Twitter. IT Professional, 18(2), 66–70.
- Damico, N., & Krutka, D.G. (2018). Social media diaries and fasts: Educating for digital mindfulness with preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 109-119. Doi:10.1016/J.tate.2018.03.009
- Dede, C. (2006). Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231-251.
- Gee, J.P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Greenhalgh, S.P. (2018). Spaces and their social frontiers: Using community dimensions to distinguish between teacher-focused hashtags on Twitter (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing MI. SITE 2019-Las Vegas, NV, United States, March 18-22, 2019
- Greenhalgh, S.P., Rosenberg, J.M., & Wolf, L.G. (2016). For all intents and purposes: Twitter as a foundational technology for teachers. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1-2), 81-98.
- Greenhow, C., Campbell, D., Galvin, S., & Askari, E. (2018, March). Social Media in Teacher Professional Development: A Literature Review. In E. Langran& J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information
- Hsieh, B. (2017). Making and missing connections: Exploring Twitter chats as a learning tool in a preservice teacher education course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 549-568.
- Karpf, D. (2012). Social science research methods in Internet time. Information, Communication& Society, 15, 639661. Doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.665468Kearney,M.W.(N.D.).{TweetBotOrNot} [Web application.] Retrieved from https://mikewk.shinyapps.io/botornot/
- Krutka, D.G., Nowell, S., & Whitlock, A.M. (2017). Towards a social media pedagogy: Successes and shortcomings in educative uses of Twitter with teacher candidates. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(2), 215-240.
- Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on WorldWide Web (WWW 2010) (pp. 591-600). Association for
- Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315. Doi:10.1016/J.tate.2018.07.008
- Lin, P.-C., & Huang, P.-M. (2013). A study of effective features for detecting long-surviving Twitter spam accounts. In The 15th International Conference on Advanced Communications Technology (ICACT), Technical Proceedings 2013 (pp. 841–846). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
- Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291-307. Doi:10.1016/J.tate.2016.01.021
- Mowbray, M. (2014). Automated twitter accounts. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds). Twitter and society (pp. 183-194). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
- Nagle, J. (2018). Twitter, cyber-violence, and the need for a critical social media literacy in teacher education: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 86-94. Doi:10.1016/J.tate.2018.08.014
- Preece, J., & Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2005). Online communities: Design, theory, and practice. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4).
- Rosenberg, J.M., Greenhalgh, S.P., Koehler, M.J., Hamilton, E.R., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). An investigation of state educational Twitter hashtags (SETHs) as affinity spaces. E-learning and Digital Media, 13(1-2), 24-44.
- Shelton, C., & Archambault, L. (2019). Discovering how teachers build virtual relationships and develop as professionals through online teacherpreneurship. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(4), 579-602.
- Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J., & Gosse, C. (2018). Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media& Society, 20(12), 4689–4708.
- Xing, W., & Gao, F. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computers& Education, 126, 388-398. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2018.08.010
- Yang, C., Harkreader, R.C., & Gu, G. (2011, September). Die free or live hard? Empirical evaluation and new design for fighting evolving Twitter spammers. In R. Sommer, D. Balzarotti, & G. Maier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID) (pp. 318-337). Menlo Park, CA:
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References