You are here:

Digital Storytelling as a Problem-Solving Strategy in Mathematics Teacher Education: How Making a Math-eo Engages and Excites 21st Century Students

, , ,

IJTES Volume 2, Number 1, ISSN 2651-5369 Publisher: International Journal of Technology in Education and Science


This study examines whether creating a mathematics-based digital story increases pre-service teachers’ understanding of the problem solving process, the relationship among visual, auditory and verbal representation in critical thinking/problem solving in mathematics. Survey results indicated that pre-service teachers were unfamiliar with the uses of technology in the teaching process. However, as they worked through the writing/problem solving procedures and constructed digital stories, they became more aware of the advantages of using this multimodal product, called Math-eos, to teach mathematical concepts to elementary/middle school students. The pre-service teachers perceived that Math-eos offered a “cool” new tool for their own learning and teaching and for integrating digital technology in mathematics education to increase student engagement, motivation and acquisition of content knowledge.


Walters, L., Green, M., Goldsby, D. & Parker, D. (2018). Digital Storytelling as a Problem-Solving Strategy in Mathematics Teacher Education: How Making a Math-eo Engages and Excites 21st Century Students. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 2(1), 1-16. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Albano, G. & Pierri, A. (2014). Digital storytelling for improving mathematical literacy. In S. Carreira, N. Amado, K. Jones& H. Jacinto (Eds), Proceedings of the Problem@Web international conference: technology, creativity and affect in mathematical problem solving (pp. 23–34). Faro: Universidade do
  2. Blocher, M. (2008). Digital storytelling and reflective assessment. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 892-901).
  3. Bowman, C.A. (2000). Infusing technology-based instructional frameworks in the methods courses: A response to Pope and Golub. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 98-101. Retrieved on March 10, 2008 from
  4. Bran, R. (2010). Message in a bottle Telling stories in a digital world. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1790-1793.
  5. Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-21.
  6. Bunnett, R. (2007). Writing in the Mathematics Classroom: Does It Have an Effect on Students’ Mathematical Reasoning? Digital Commans@University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved on 12 May 2015 from Viewcontent.cgi?article=1008 & Context=mathmidsummative.
  7. Casey, B., Kersh, J.E. & Young, J.M. (2004). Storytelling sagas: an effective medium for teaching early childhood mathematics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 167–172.
  8. Chai, C.S., Ling Koh, J.H., Tsai, C.-C. & Lee Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers& Education, 57(1), 1184 –1193.
  9. Collier, J., & Veres, M. (2006). Digital storytelling in an early childhood literacy methods course: Authentic product development’s impact on students’ valuing of technology and its potential use in future instruction. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4247-4250). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  10. Davis, M. & Waggett, D. (2006). Enhancing pre-service teachers‟ reflective practice via technology competencies and e-portfolio development. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. Retrieved on September 10, 2007 from
  11. Dunleavy, M. & Heinecke, W. (2007). The impact of 1:1 laptop use on middle school math and science standardized test scores. Computers in the Schools, 24, 7-22.
  12. Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-28.
  13. Evans, B.P. & Gunter, G.A. (2004). A catalyst for change: influencing preservice teacher technology proficiency. Journal of Educational Media& Library Science, 41(3), 325–336.
  14. Funkhouser, B.J. & Mouza, C. (2013). Drawing on technology: an investigation of preservice teacher beliefs in the context of an introductory educational technology course. Computers& Education, 62, 271–285.
  15. Goldsby, D., Rackley, R., Allen, D., & Yetkiner, Z.E. (2010).Perceptions of pre-service teachers technology ability. Southwest Educational Research Association 2010 Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, February17-20, 2010.
  16. Green, M. (2011). Teaching the writing process through digital storytelling in pre-service education. Retrieved on April 28, 2015 from DASHDASH
  17. Hoban, G., Loughran, J. & Nielsen, W. (2011). Slowmation: Preservice elementary teachers representing science knowledge through creating multimodal digital animations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 985–1009.
  18. Hooper, S., & Rieber, L.P. (1995). Teaching with technology. In A.C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into practice, (pp. 154-170). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  19. Huang, K., Lubin, I.A. & Ge, X. (2011). Situated learning in an educational technology course for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1200–1212.
  20. Jonassen, D.H. (2003). Designing research-based instruction for story problems. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 3, 267–297.
  21. Kay, R.H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: a review of the literature. Journal on Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383 –408.
  22. Kearney, M. & Schuck, S. (2005). Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning with student-generated video. In P. Kommers& G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 2864-2871).
  23. Kjos, R. & Long, K. (1994). Improving critical thinking and problem solving in fifth grade mathematics. Unpublished Master’s Research project, Saint Xavier University and IRI/Skylight.
  24. Lambert, J. (2006). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community. Berkeley, CA: Digital Diner Press.
  25. Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: what technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87–98.
  26. Liu, C., Liu, K., Chen, W., Lin, C. & Chen, G. (2011). Collaborative storytelling experiences in social media: influence of peer-assistance mechanisms. Computers& Education, 57(2), 1544–1556.
  27. Lombardi, M. (2007) Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview. Educasue Learning Initiative. Retrieved on May 26, 2015 from
  28. Miller, S.M. & McVee, M.B. (2012). Multimodal composing: the essential 21st century literacy. In S.M. Miller& M.B. McWee (Eds), Multimodal composing in classrooms: learning and teaching for the digital world (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.
  29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  30. Moursund, D. & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age: a national survey on information technology in teacher education. Oregon: Milken Family Foundation.
  31. Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S.Y. & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers& Education, 71, 206–221.
  32. Nahrgang, C. & Petersen, B. (1986).Using Writing to Learn Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 79(6) 461-65.
  33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards. New for Horizons
  34. Paul, C. (2002). Self-Perceptions and social connections: Empowerment through digital storytelling in adult education. Unpublished dissertation University of California, Berkley.
  35. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  36. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  37. Pope, M., Hare, D. & Howard, E. (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what pre-service teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 191– 204.
  38. Pugalee, D.K. (1997). Connecting writing to the mathematics curriculum. Mathematics Teacher, 90, 308-310.
  39. Pugalee, D.K. (2001), Writing, Mathematics, and Metacognition: Looking for Connections Through Students' Work in Mathematical Problem Solving. Science and Mathematics, 101: 236–245. Doi:10.1111/J.19498594.2001.tb18026.X.Riesland,E.(2005)Visualliteracy in the classroom. Learning. Http://
  40. Robin, B. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful tool for the 21 st Century classroom. Theory into Practice, 47, 220-228.
  41. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in schools with computer-based technologies. Children and computer technology, 10(2), 76-101.
  42. Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M.M. (2013). Assessing students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Asian Social Science, 16, 54-60.
  43. Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 487-506.
  44. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J. & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers& Education, 54(1), 103-112.
  45. Schank, D. (1990). Tell Me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  46. Schiro, M. (1997). Integrating children’s literature and mathematics: Children as problem-solvers, literary critics, and meaning-makers. New York: Teachers College Press.
  47. Schiro, M. (2004). Oral storytelling and teaching mathematics: Pedagogical and multicultural perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage.
  48. Schlattmann, J. (2006). Improving mathematics problem solving through written explanations. University of Nebraska-Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska– Lincoln. Summative Projects for MA Degree Math in the Middle Institute. Retrieved on 11 May 2015 from
  49. Scholes, R. (1981). Language, narrative, and anti-narrative. In W.J.T.Mitchell (Ed.), On Narrative (pp. 200208).
  50. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1),-22.
  51. Silver, E.A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 521.
  52. Spaniol, M., Klamma, R., Sharda, N. & Jarke, M. (2006). Web-based learning with non-linear multimedia stories. In W. Liu, Q. Li& R.W.H. Lau (Eds), ICWL 2006 LNCS 4181 (pp. 249–263). Verlag Berlin
  53. Welchman-Tischler, R. (1992). How to use children’s literature to teach mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  54. Wilburne, J.M. & Napoli, M. (2008). Connecting mathematics and literature: An analysis of pre-service elementary school teachers' changing beliefs and knowledge. Issues in the Education of Undergraduate Mathematics Teacher, 2, Pedagogy, 1–9.
  55. Woodbridge, J. (2004). Technology integration as a transforming teaching strategy. TechLearning. Retrieved on July 20, 2014 from Php?articleID=17701367.
  56. Yuksel, P., Robin, B., & McNeil, S. (2011). Educational uses of digital storytelling all around the world. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 1264-1271).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact