You are here:

From knowing silence to curious engagement: The role of general practitioners to discuss and refer to complementary and alternative medicine
ARTICLE

, Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, New Zealand ; , Bioethics Centre, New Zealand ; , Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, New Zealand

Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 2405-4526 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

In many OECD countries up to half of the population uses complementary and alternative medicines (CAM). CAM refers to the diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not presently considered to be part of conventional medicine. In those countries nearly all patients will also consult their General Practitioner (GP), and it is therefore important to consider how treatment from these different practitioners might affect the patient-doctor relationship. Despite goodwill on both sides to engage, there may be a mutual reluctance between both patients and GPs to communicate about CAM. To date research has predominately focused upon how GPs perceive CAM with limited studies on the ethical and legal concerns over this necessary dialogue. Drawing upon the data from OECD countries, particularly New Zealand, this paper suggests that, from an ethical standpoint, GPs have a responsibility to discuss CAM with their patients, and potentially refer to, complementary practitioners. Such a responsibility is grounded upon the ethical norms of beneficence (the physician's general duty of care) and the patient's rights of autonomous and informed choices. It encourages effective communication to develop mutual understanding and provide better care to the patient.

Citation

Roberts, K., Nie, J.B. & Dowell, T. (2017). From knowing silence to curious engagement: The role of general practitioners to discuss and refer to complementary and alternative medicine. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 9(1), 104-107. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved April 14, 2021 from .

This record was imported from Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice on March 1, 2019. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2017.09.004

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References