You are here:

Video Artivism: The Poetics of Symbolic Conflict


Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal Volume 26, Number 57, ISSN 1134-3478


The relationship between signs and human action is one of the most-widely studied theories in art and communication. Humans are constantly producing new discourse and new discursive devices, and the issue of the relationship between signs / action not only remains open but is branching off and forming hybrids towards other materials. This work explores one of its branches. We performed a theoretical inquiry on the foundations of video artivism, with the aim of achieving a conceptual definition. Firstly, the purpose of the study is defined and the historical background and basic sources of influence described in order to trace a map of its fields of application in teaching practices and empirical research. The results, therefore, come from a bibliographic review of academic as well as artistic and activist sources, which were based on sections of the differentiating features they respectively recognize and self-recognize to be an artivist. Six identified features are described: the intervention function, the hybrid code, against domination, disruption, disavowal, and subversion, which are aimed at establishing processes, procedures, subjects and the specific forms in which artivism has an impact on society. The article also refers to selected cases as a conceptual sample of the theoretical assumptions made and to describe their capacity for transformation.


Mateos, C. & Sedeño, A. (2018). Video Artivism: The Poetics of Symbolic Conflict. Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, 26(57), 49-58. Retrieved December 6, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on January 9, 2019. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.