You are here:


Research in Social Sciences and Technology Volume 2, Number 1, ISSN 2468-6891 e-ISSN 2468-6891 Publisher: Research in Social Sciences and Technology


This exploratory study surveyed how undergraduate students and higher education instructors at two small faith-based universities in Southern California used mobile devices in and outside of the class for academic purposes. The researcher cross-referenced the results from the two groups to make correlations. The results of this study showed that nearly all instructor participants had multiple devices and almost half of the student participants had two or more devices as well. Those devices are being used in and outside of formal class for academics in very basic and emerging way that are just touching the surface of their capabilities. This study found that students use their devices in class to read, reference, or search materials. Faculty reported using their devices as presentation devices most often.Â


Hoffmann, M. (2017). AN EXPLORATORY STUDY: MOBILE DEVICE USE FOR ACADEMICS. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 2(1),. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Ally, M. (2004). Using learning theories to design instruction for mobile learning devices. In J. Attewell & C. Savill-Smith (Eds.), Mobile learning anytime everywhere (pp. 5-8).
  2. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Corporation.
  3. Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118. Retrieved from
  4. Chang, C., Chatterjea, K., Goh, D., Theng, Y., Lim, E., Sun, A., & Nguyen, Q. (2012). Lessons from learner experiences in a field-based inquiry in geography using mobile devices. International Research In Geographical& Environmental Education, 21(1), 41-58.
  5. Cruz-Flores, R., & Lopez-Morteo, G. (2010). A framework for educational collaborative activities based on mobile devices. International Journal Of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 4(3), 9-18.
  6. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525-534.
  7. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPACK) for educators. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group for the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
  8. Korkmaz, U. & Yurtseven, Z. (2016). Turkish pre-service teachers’ experiences with contemporary technology games and perceptions about teaching with instructional games. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(1), 44-58.
  9. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Learning cultures on the move: Where are we heading? Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 13(4), 4-14. Retrieved from
  10. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247-254.
  11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  12. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  13. Tarman, B. (2016). Innovation and education. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(1),77-97.
  14. Terras, M.M., & Ramsay, J. (2012). The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 820-832.
  15. Traxler, J. (2010, January). The “learner experience” of mobiles, mobility and connectedness. Paper presented at ELESIG Symposium: Digital Futures, Reading, UK. Retrieved from
  16. Wexler, E. (2014). What are teens doing online? Retrieved from
  17. Wu, W.H., Jim Wu, Y.C., Chen, C.Y., Kao, H.Y., Lin, C.H., & Huang, S.H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers& Education, 59(2),817-827. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2012.03.016

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact