You are here:

Teachers' Attitudes Toward the Use of Technology in Social Studies Teaching
article

, , , , ,

Research in Social Sciences and Technology Volume 1, Number 1, ISSN 2468-6891 e-ISSN 2468-6891 Publisher: Research in Social Sciences and Technology

Abstract

Technology integration in education is one of the most popular topics in the last decades. Many countries have invested millions of dollars to equip classrooms with technological devices. As well as developed countries, Turkey has conducted several projects to provide technological devices and educational materials to classrooms. Technology has the potential to increase the quality of learning and teaching process. However, having technological devices in classroom alone will not cause the increase of the quality of education. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine teachers' attitudes toward the use of technology in social studies teaching. Understanding social studies teachers' attitudes is essential because it is a way to figure out how they integrate technology and define barriers. The authors applied quantitative survey method and used cluster sampling to choose participants. The sample of the study consisted of 155 social studies teachers who are currently teaching at middle schools. The use of technology in social studies teaching attitude scale was used to collect data. The findings revealed that teachers have positive beliefs and attitudes toward the use of technology. Also, the findings showed that teachers who are working at private schools have significantly high attitudes than others who are teaching at public schools. Moreover, teachers who took educational technology and teaching material course and attended in-service training have more positive attitudes than others.

Citation

Kilinc, E., Kilinc, S., Kaya, M., Başer, E., Er Türküresin, H. & Kesten, A. (2016). Teachers' Attitudes Toward the Use of Technology in Social Studies Teaching. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(1),. Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Açıkalın, M., & Erdinç, D. (2005). The use of computer technologies in the social studies classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 18-27.
  2. Akkoyunlu, B. & Orhan, F. (2003). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi (BOTE) bölümü öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayar kullanma öz yeterlik inancı ile demografik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 86-93.
  3. Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519-524.
  4. An, H., Wilder, H. & Lim, K. (2011). Preparing elementary pre-service teachers from a nontraditional student population to teach with technology. Computers in the Schools,28(2), 170-193.
  5. Andrew, L. (2007). Comparison of teacher educators’ instructional methods with the constructivist ideal. The Teacher Educator, 42(3), 157–184.
  6. Armitage, D. (1993). Where are the girls? Increasing female participation in computer, math,and science education. In D. Carey, R. Carey, D.A. Willis, & J. Willis (Eds.),Technology and teacher education annual. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Kılınç, Kılınç, Kaya, Başer, Er Türküresin, & Kesten Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(1) 59-76 Technology and Technology Education (pp. 14–18). Charlottesville, VA: Association
  7. Ayas, C. (2015). The role of media in geography courses from the perspective of preservice social studies teachers. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 172-189.
  8. Banister, S. (2010). Integrating the iPod Touch in K-12 education: Visions and vices. Computers in the Schools, 27(2), 121–131.
  9. Baytak, A., Tarman, B., & Ayas, C. (2011). Experiencing technology integration in education: children's perceptions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2),139.
  10. Biggs, J.B., & Moore, P.J. (1993). The process of learning. Melbourne: Prentice Hall.
  11. Bozionelos, N. (2001). The relationship of instrumental and expressive traits with computer anxiety, Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 955–974.
  12. Cener, E., Acun, İ., & Demirhan, G. (2015). The impact of ICT on pupil’s achievement and attitudes in social studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190-207.
  13. Chai, C.S., & Khine, M.S. (2006). Understanding ICT integration in schools. In M.S. Khine(Ed.), Teaching with technology: Strategies for engaging learners (pp. 49–62).
  14. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. Darling-Hammond, L.,Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (February, 2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council. Http://www.nsdc.org/news/NSDCstudy2009.pdf.
  15. Ebel, R.L. (1980). Survey research in education: The need and the value. Peabody Journal of Education, 57(2), 126-134.
  16. Enriquez, A.G. (2010). Enhancing student performance using Tablet computers. College Teaching, 58(3), 77–84.
  17. Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers& Education, 59(2), 423-435.
  18. Evans, R.T., Kilinc, E., Waxman, H.C., & Houston, W.R. (2012, March). Investigating the Availability and Use of Technology in Urban Middle School Classrooms. In Society for
  19. Fox, R., & Henri, J. (2005). Understanding Teacher mindsets: IT and change in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), 161–169.
  20. Frankel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. Public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). Washington, DC: National Center for
  22. İpek, C., & Acuner, H.Y. (2011). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bilgisayar öz-yeterlik inançları ve eğitim teknolojilerine yönelik tutumları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 23-40.
  23. Kesten, A. (2010). Computer technology in education and issues of power and equity. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 1(1), 88-106.
  24. Kim, C., Kim, M.K., Lee, C., Spector, J.M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85.
  25. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  26. Kutluca, T., & Ekici, G. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayar destekli eğitime ilişkin tutum ve öz-yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 177-188.
  27. Leedy, P.D., & Ormrod, J.E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  28. Lowther, D., Strahl, J.D., Inan, F.A., & Ross, S.M. (2008). Does technology integration“work” when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45, 195–213.
  29. Mahoney, M.P. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward stem: Development of an instrument for high school stem-based programs. The Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 24-34.
  30. National Education Association. (2008). Technology in schools: The ongoing challenge of access, adequacy, and equity. Policy Brief# 19. Washington DC: NEA Policy and Practice Department.
  31. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
  32. Pouezevara, S., Dinçer, A., Kipp, S., & Sarışık, Y. (2013). Turkey's FATIH project: A plan to conquer the digital divide or a technological leap of faith. Turkey: RTI International& Education Reform Initiative (ERI).
  33. Teo, T., Chai, C.S., Hung, D. & Lee, C.B. (2008) Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre‐service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,36(2), 163-174.
  34. Torkzadeh, R., Pflughoeft, K. & Hall, L. (1999). Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: An empirical study. Behavior& Information Technology, 18 (4). 299–309.
  35. Usluel, Y.K., Mumcu, F.K., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri: Öğretmenlerin entegrasyon süreci ve engelleriyle ilgili görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 164-178.
  36. Voogt, J., Tilya, F., & Van den Akker, J. (2009). Science teacher learning for MBL-supported student-centered science education in the context of secondary education in Tanzania. Journal of Science and Education and Technology, 18, 419-428.
  37. Waxman, H.C., Evans, R.T., Boriack, A.W., & Kılınç, E. (2013). Systematic observations of the availability and use of instructional technology in urban middle school classrooms. Journal of Contemporary Research in Education, 1(3), 104-114.
  38. Williams, M., Linn, M.C., Ammon, P., & Gearhart, M. (2004). Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: a case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 189-206.
  39. Yücel, C., Acun, İ., Tarman, B., & Tugba, M. (2010). A Model to Explore Turkish Teachers' ICT Integration Stages. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 19.
  40. Yiğit, E. Ö., Çengelci, T., & Karaduman, H. (2013). Pre-service social studies teachers’ views about reflection of technology on values. Journal of Social Studies Education Research,4(1), 73-96.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.