You are here:

Benefits of Classroom Technology

, University of North Texas, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-35-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA


Cutting-edge technology is quickly becoming common in education. The availability is more prevalent because much of the technology has become more affordable and remains justly priced. There has been a huge process transition that augments, exercise, and encourages the usage of the most popular and innovative technological discoveries specifically for learning. For instance, touchscreen is becoming the norm and has progressed from phones to tablets to laptops, not desk-tops and TV's even have touch screen technology. A growing and ever increasing amount of old-style schoolrooms issue cutting-edge personal-use technological tools as a way to share the curriculum.

The most handy tool seems to be the tablet. It's very affordable, has most of the functions as do computers, and it enhances the capabilities of learning by maintaining multiple text books, several libraries, a study mate named Google, and her friend You Tube. Today's student population are very familiar with all levels of learning technology, and a growing number of schools are issuing laptops instead of text books and curriculum.


Baker, B. (2018). Benefits of Classroom Technology. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1337-1340). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
  2. Kim, K.J., & Bonk, C.J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause quarterly, 29(4), 22-30.
  3. Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 153-160
  4. Li, F., & Liu, W. (2007). Emerging eLearning Technologies. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. 5(2), 2.
  5. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
  6. O’Quinn, L., & Corry, M. (2002). Factors that deter faculty from participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3 (3). Retrieved from
  7. Rockwell, S.K, Schauer, J., Fritz, S.M., & Marx, D.B. (1999). Incentives and obstacles influencing higher education faculty and administrators to teach via distance, Online Journal of Distance. Learning Administration, 2(4). Retrieved from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact


Slides w/Audio View