You are here:

Parents’ and Students’ Attitudes Toward Tablet Integration in Schools ARTICLE

, , , , , Central China Normal University

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 4, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

This study explored parents’ and students’ attitudes toward tablet usage in a formal educational setting. A total of 212 students from four 7th-grade classes, along with 145 of their parents, responded to the Tablet Acceptance Questionnaire. Quantitative methods including a t-test and partial least square (PLS) analyses were employed to examine students’ and parents’ attitudes toward tablet integration in schools, and to investigate factors influencing students’ and parents’ attitudes toward tablet usage, respectively. The results indicated significant differences between students’ and parents’ attitudes. Empirical findings suggested students hold more positive views than their parents with regard to tablet usage, tablet benefits for learning, and technical advantages and ease of use. Conversely, parents expressed greater concern over potential negative effects of tablet usage in education than do their children. This study also suggested educational benefits of tablet usage were the key factor influencing both students’ and parents’ attitudes. Based on the cross-examined understanding of parents’ and students’ attitudes, suggestions for large scale tablet initiatives are proposed.

Citation

Zhu, S., Yang, H., MacLeod, J., Shi, Y. & Wu, D. (2018). Parents’ and Students’ Attitudes Toward Tablet Integration in Schools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 18, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adebowale, O.F., Adediwura, A.A., & Bada, T.A. (2009). Correlates of Computer attitude among
  2. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological
  3. Bebell, D., & O’Dwyer, L.M. (2010). Educational Outcomes and research from 1:1 Computing settings.
  4. Billon, M., Lera-Lopez, F., & Marco, R. (2010). Differences in digitalization levels: A multivariate analysis studying the global digital divide. Review of World Economics, 146(1), 39-73.
  5. Blume, H. (2014). L.A. Parents must give OK before iPads sent home with students. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-la-parents-ipads-20140425story.html
  6. Boticki, I., Baksa, J., Seow, P., & Looi, C.K. (2015). Usage of a Mobile social learning platform with virtual badges in a primary school. Computers& Education, 86, 120-136.
  7. Chen, X.B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning& Technology, 17(1), 20-36. Doi: 10125/24503
  8. Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). New Jersey: Lawrence
  9. Chu, H.C., Hwang, G.J., Huang, S.X., & Wu, T.T. (2008). A knowledge engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning. The Electronic Library, 26(3), 303-317.
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  11. Çuhadar, C. (2014). Information technology pre-service teachers’ acceptance of tablet PCs as an innovative learning tool. Educational Sciences: Theory& Practice, 14(2), 741-753. Doi:10.12738/estp.2014.2.2038236
  12. Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2014). Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40-46.
  13. Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the technology acceptance model (TAM) to
  14. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F.L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452.
  15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  16. Garland, K.J., & Noyes, J.M. (2004). Computer experience: A poor predictor of computer attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(6), 823-840.
  17. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., & Boudreau, M.C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression:
  18. Gobbo, C., & Girardi, M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and integration of information and communications technology in Italian schools. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1-2), 63-86.
  19. Helmstadter, G.C. (1964). Principles of psychological measurement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  20. Hill, P. (2013). Examination systems: Asia-Pacific secondary education system review series No. 1. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO.
  21. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525-534.
  22. Khan, A.I., Al-Shihi, H., Al-khanjari, Z.A. & Sarrab, M. (2015). Mobile learning (M-learning) adoption in
  23. Kiger, D., & Herro, D. (2015). Bring your own device: Parental guidance (PG) suggested. TechTrends, 59(5), 51-61.
  24. Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Lu, F., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2013). Internet addiction among elementary and middle
  25. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  26. Park, E., & Pobil, A. (2013). Technology acceptance model for the use of tablet PCs. Wireless Personal Communications, 73(4), 1561-1672.
  27. Pegrum, M., Howitt, C., & Striepe, M. (2013). Learning to take the tablet: How pre-service teachers use iPads to facilitate their learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 464479.
  28. Robertson, M., Grady, N., Fluck, A., & Webb, I. (2006). Conversations toward effective implementation of
  29. Salajan, F.D., Schonwetter, D.J., & Cleghorn, B.M. (2010). Student and faculty inter-generational digital divide: Factor fiction?. Computers& Education, 55(3), 1393-1403. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2010.06.017
  30. Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95-110. Doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00032-7
  31. Segars, A.H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within
  32. Shih, J.L., Chu, H.C., Hwang, G.J., & Kinshuk. (2011). An investigation of attitudes of students and
  33. Soykan, E. (2015). Views of students’, teachers’ and parents’ on the tablet computer usage in education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 228-244.
  34. Zhang, X.L., & He, W. (2013, September 4). E-schoolbag promotion meet the strongest blocking. Southern Metropolis Daily. Retrieved from http://epaper.oeeee.com/epaper/H/html/201309/04/content_2362713.htm?div=-1

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.