You are here:

Critical Factors of the Adoption of e-Textbooks: A Comparison Between Experienced and Inexperienced Users ARTICLE

, National Chengchi University ; , National Cheng Kung University, R.O.C, Taiwan ; , National Chung Cheng University, R.O.C., Taiwan

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 4, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

The use of e-textbooks has become popular in certain countries, yet there is debate in the literature about whether it is advantageous to adopt e-textbooks and if they positively influence students’ learning and performance. Prior studies on the acceptance of e-textbooks were mainly based on one theoretical perspective, and did not differentiate samples between experienced and inexperienced users. From a social- and task-related view, this study aims to identify the critical factors that stimulate acceptance intentions of e-textbooks among tertiary students, particularly between experienced and inexperienced users. Based on 912 questionnaires, this study found that performance expectancy, perceived enjoyment, and perceived task-technology fit are the factors affecting students’ behavioral intention for acceptance in both sampling groups. However, social impact only has significant influence on acceptance intention of inexperienced users. Also, gender has a moderating effect on the relationship of performance expectancy and behavioral intention of inexperienced users only. This study provides useful implications for marketing e-textbooks, and fills the literature gap.

Citation

Hung, W.H., Hsieh, P.H. & Huang, Y.D. (2018). Critical Factors of the Adoption of e-Textbooks: A Comparison Between Experienced and Inexperienced Users. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557-582.
  2. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
  3. Al-Ali, S., & Ahmed, A. (2015). E-textbooks in ESL classrooms: Are learners on board? Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 12(2). Retrieved from http://lthe.zu.ac.ae/index.php/lthehome/issue/view/13
  4. Amoroso, D.L., & Hunsinger, D.S. (2009). Understanding consumers' acceptance of online purchasing. Journal of Information Technology Management, 10(1), 15-41.
  5. Baker, E.W., Al-Gahtani, S.S., & Hubona, G.S. (2010). Cultural impacts on acceptance and adoption of
  6. Boroughs, D. (2010, April). Bye the book: In educational publishing, the only certainty is change. Retrieved from http://www.prism-magazine.org/apr10/feature_01.cfm
  7. Chen, P.Y., & Hitt, L.M. (2002). Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention
  8. Chung, J., & Tan, F.B. (2004). Antecedents of perceived playfulness: An exploratory study on user acceptance of general information-searching websites. Information& Management, 41(7), 869881.
  9. Clough, G., Jones, A.C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359-371.
  10. Dasgupta, S., Haddad, M., Weiss, P., & Bermudez, E. (2007). User acceptance of CASE tools in systems analysis and design: An empirical study. Journal of Informatics Education Research, 9(1), 51-78.
  11. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
  12. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers 186
  13. Dennis, A.R., Abaci, S., Morrone, A.S., Plaskoff, J., & McNamara, K. (2016). Effects of e-textbook
  14. Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson, T.J., & Wiley, D.A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of
  15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and
  16. Goodhue, D.L., & Thompson, R.L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(1), 213-236.
  17. Gu, X., Wu, B., & Xu, X. (2015). Design, development, and learning in e-Textbooks: What we learned and where we are going. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 25-41.
  18. Gurung, R.A.R., & Daniel, D. (2005). Do text-based pedagogical features enhance student learning? In D.S. Dunn, & S.L. Chew (Eds.), Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology (pp. 41-55).
  19. Hsiao, C.H., Tang, K.Y., & Lin, C.H. (2015). Exploring college students’ intention to adopt e-textbooks: A modified technology acceptance model. Libri, 65(2), 119-128.
  20. Isa, S.M., & Wong, K.Y. (2015). Age differences in behavioral intention to use internet marketing: A
  21. Johnston, D., Berg, S., Pillon, K., & Williams, M. (2015). Ease of use and usefulness as measures of student experience in a multi-platform e-textbook pilot. Library Hi Tech, 33(1), 65-82.
  22. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: Across-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183213.
  23. Kohnke, A., Cole, M., & Bush, R. (2014). Incorporating UTAUT predictors for understanding home care
  24. Kuo, R.Z. (2011). Knowledge management system adoption: Exploring the effects of empowering leadership, task-technology fit and compatibility. Behaviour& Information Technology, 30(1), 113-129.
  25. Lai, J.Y., & Ulhas, K.R. (2012). Understanding acceptance of dedicated e-textbook applications for learning: Involving Taiwanese university students. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 321-338.
  26. Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information& Management, 42(8), 1095-1104.
  27. Lin, T.C., & Huang, C.C. (2008). Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Information& Management, 45(6), 410-417.
  28. Liu, W.Y., & Tsai, C.H. (2011). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding learning
  29. Marcolin, B.L., Compeau, D.R., Munro, M.C., & Huff, S.L. (2000). Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Information Systems Research, 11(1), 37-60.
  30. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
  31. Maynard, S., & Cheyne, E. (2005). Can electronic textbooks help children to learn? The Electronic Library, 23(1), 103-115.
  32. Moon, J.W., & Kim, Y.G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide web context. Information& Management, 38(1), 217-230.
  33. Ngafeeson, M.N., & Sun, J. (2015). The effects of technology innovativeness and system exposure on
  34. Shin, S., Chung, N., Hart, R.J., Joun, Y., & Koo, C. (2015). Examining technology perception and user competence on two types of smartphone usages. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2015 (P. 105). Retrieved from
  35. Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92.
  36. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., & Howell, J.M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124-143.
  37. Vander Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695704.
  38. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Maruping, L.M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations
  39. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  40. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115139.
  41. Venkatesh,V., Morris, M.G., & Ackerman, P.L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender
  42. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
  43. Vessey, I. (1991). Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences, 22(2), 219-240.
  44. Wang, H.I., & Yang, H.L. (2005). The role of personality traits in UTAUT model under online stocking. Contemporary Management Research, 1(1), 69-82.
  45. Woody, W.D., Daniel, D.B., & Baker, C.A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers& Education, 55(3), 945-948.
  46. Wu, J.H., & Wang, S.C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information& Management, 42(5), 719-729.
  47. Young, J.R. (2001). A university that reveres tradition experiments with e-books. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(36), 35-46.
  48. Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760-767.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.