You are here:

“Doing the courses without stopping my life”: Time in a professional Master’s program ARTICLE

, , University of Alberta

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 4, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press


This study investigates how time intersects with student learning in Canada’s first, and only, Master of Library and Information Studies (MLIS) in an online teaching and learning stream. Thirty-two students responded to a survey that asked about their experiences, perceptions, and challenges after their first year of the program. Descriptive statistics and NVIVO 10 were used to analyze survey responses and to develop themes through open coding. The findings indicate that time shapes students’ decisions to pursue the MLIS online, their perception of what the degree might mean for their future, their experience in the program, the quality of their relationships, and their learning. The perceived flexibility of the MLIS program was incredibly important to students. However, the majority of students described themselves as “time poor” and many students underestimated the time commitment necessary to complete the program, to manage coursework, and to build and maintain relationships with others.


Oliphant, T. & Branch-Mueller, J. (2018). “Doing the courses without stopping my life”: Time in a professional Master’s program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231-246. Doi:10.1080/10494820902809147
  2. Allan, B. (2007). Time to learn? E-learners’ experience of time in virtual learning communities. Management Learning, 38(5), 557-572.
  3. American Library Association. (2018). About ALA. Retrieved from
  4. Barbera, E., & Clara, M. (2012). Time in e-learning research: A qualitative review of the empirical
  5. Brown, A.H., & Green, T. (2009). Time students spend reading threaded discussions in online graduate
  6. Burke, P.J., Bennett, A., Ramsay, G., Stevenson, J., & Clegg, S. (2016, December). It’s about time:
  7. Henderson, H. (2016, December). Thinking about the future: Potential sociologies of higher education
  8. Kabat-Ryan, K. (2014). Fixed and manipulated temporal frames: Procedural analysis of students’ perceptions of electronic time on the discussion board. In E. Barbera& P. Reimann (Eds.), Assessment and evaluation of time factors in online teaching and learning (pp. 163-197).
  9. Lazaros, E., & Flowers, J. (2014). Keys to succeeding in a master’s program. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(5), 34-39.
  10. Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35, 141-185. Doi:10.1007/s11251-006-9001-6
  11. Mardsen, R. (1996). Time, space, and distance education. Distance Education, 17(2), 222-246.
  12. McNeill, W. (2014). Time and the working online learner. In E. Barbera& P. Reimann (Eds.), Assessment and evaluation of time factors in online teaching and learning (pp. 24-62). Hershey, PA:
  13. Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in elearning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292-297.
  14. Romero, M., & Barbera, E. (2011). Quality of learners’ time and learning performance beyond quantitative time-on-task. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(5), 125137.
  15. Valenta, A., Therriault, D., Dieter, M., & Mrtek, R. (2001). Identifying student attitudes and learning styles in distance education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(2).
  16. Winter, C., Cotton, D., Gavin, J., & J.D. Yorke. (2010). Effective e-learning? Multi-tasking, distractions,

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact