“To flip or not to flip, that’s the question” – Findings from an exploratory study into factors that may influence tertiary teachers to consider a flipped classroom model ARTICLE
Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Volume 22, Number 1, ISSN 1179-7665 e-ISSN 1179-7665 Publisher: Distance Education Association of New Zealand
The concept of \u2018flipping the classroom\u2019 is relatively recent, although elements of it have been around for many years. It is generally accepted that the \u2018flipped classroom model\u2019 consists of replacing direct instruction, or lectures, with video-clips to be watched at home, and the use of face-to-face class time for engaging students in active learning activities. This development was brought about by the enhanced and easy access to video technologies. This model was initially adopted for use in secondary education, but is now increasingly considered by teachers in higher education. However, there is both confusion and scepticism about what this concept is, and whether there are any benefits of adopting this. In this exploratory study, the main focus was on seeking to identify what staff in three institutions of higher education in New Zealand considered to be the reasons for adopting and/or for not adopting, or challenges in adopting, this model. In this article, we will report on the findings from the survey aspect of this mixed methods study. The findings suggested that amongst the respondents there were three distinct groups, 1) those who saw no value adopting a flipped classroom model, considered there was nothing wrong with lectures, and that students would unwilling to engage in a flipped model; 2) those who considered that active learning was the main idea behind the flipped model, and that this was an old idea in a new guise; and 3) those who had or would like to implement the model, but had encountered or were anticipating some issues. The findings also suggested a range of understandings of what the \u2018flipped classroom\u2019 means. This highlighted the importance to clarify in any research project and reporting exactly what is meant by \u2018flipped classrooms\u2019 in order to avoid conceptual confusion.
Chellapan, L., Van der Meer, J., Pratt, K. & Wass, R. (2018). “To flip or not to flip, that’s the question” – Findings from an exploratory study into factors that may influence tertiary teachers to consider a flipped classroom model. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 22(1), 6-21. Distance Education Association of New Zealand. Retrieved September 23, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184659/.
- Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research& Development, 34(1), 1–14.
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class everyday. Alexandria, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning. Learning& Leading with Technology, 41(7), 18–23.
- Chellapan, L., & VanderMeer, J. (2015). Challenges in implementing the flipped classroom model in higher education. Handbook of Research on Active Learning and the Flipped Classroom Model in the Digital Age (pp. 352–363). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Day, J., & Foley, J. (2006). Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human–computer interaction course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(4), 420–431.
- Doyle, L., Brady, A.-M., & Byrne, G. (2016). An overview of mixed methods research: Revisited. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(8), 623–635.
- Ferreri, S., & O’Connor, S.K. (2013). Instructional design and assessment. Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1), 1–9.
- Flipped Learning Network. (2014). The four pillars of FLIP. Retrieved from https://flippedlearning.org/definition-of-flipped-learning/
- Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning& Leading with Technology, 22(8), 12–7.
- Hung, H.T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96.
- Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S.Z.M. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(2), 124–131.
- Jolliffe, I., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202.
- Klassen, A., Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V., Smith, K., & Meissner, H. (2012). Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 377–380.
- Lo, C.K., & Hew, K.F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–22.
- Lockwood, K., & Esselstein, R. (2013). The inverted classroom and the CS curriculum. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (pp. 113–118). Denver, CO.
- Milman, N.B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 11, 9–11.
- Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 1–3.
- Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D.K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481.
- O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.
- Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 196.
- Roehl, A., Reddy, S.L., & Shannon, G.J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49.
- Siegle, D. (2014). Technology: Differentiating instruction by flipping the classroom. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 51–55. Doi:10.1177/1076217513497579
- Steen-Utheim, A.T., & Foldnes, N. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 307–324.
- Tune, J.D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D.P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 316–320.
- Unruh, T., Peters, M.L., & Willis, J. (2016). Flip this classroom: A comparative study. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 38–58.
- VanderMeer, J. (2012). “I don’t really see where they’re going with it”: Communicating purpose and rationale to first-year students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(1), 81–94.
- Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S.H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 22(1)
- Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H.W. (2009). “Flipping” the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education. Biographical notes Lakshmi Chellapan
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.