You are here:

Effects of Open Textbook Adoption on Teachers’ Open Practices ARTICLE

, , Brigham Young University

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand whether certain theoretical benefits that open educational resources (OER) might have on teacher practice were being realized by a group of secondary teachers using open science textbooks. In surveys and interviews, teachers were asked to describe their classroom practice before and after adopting an open textbook, including practices relating to openness. Teachers were also asked to rate the quality of open textbooks they were using in contrast to textbooks used previously. Most participants reported changes to practice, and the most commonly cited changes could be attributed to a combination of openness and online format. For example, participants described linking textbook content to other online resources. In comparisons of current to previous practice, however, teachers did not report increases in the open practices of collaboration, revising, or adapting.

Citation

Mason, S. & Kimmons, R. (2018). Effects of Open Textbook Adoption on Teachers’ Open Practices. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 19, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Baker, A., Asino, T., Xiu, Y., & Fulgencio, J.L. (2017). Logistical issues with OER initiative in a K-12 environment. In M. Mills& D. Wake (Eds.), Empowering learners with mobile open-access learning initiatives (pp. 125-146). Chicago: IGI Global.
  2. Banilower, E.R., Smith, P.S., Weiss, I.R., Malzahn, K.A., Campbell, K.M., & Weis, A.M. (2013). Report
  3. Butcher, N., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (2008). Technology and open learning: The potential of open education resources for K–12 education. In J. Voogt& G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 725–745). Boston, MA:
  4. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2016). Standards in your state. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/standards-in-your-state/
  5. Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive openness in teacher practice. Teachers College Record, 118(9). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org.erl.lib.byu.edu/library/
  6. Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Office of Educational Technology. (nd). Open education. Retrieved from http://tech.ed.gov/open/
  7. Polikoff, M.S. (2015). How well aligned are textbooks to the common core standards in mathematics? American Educational Research Journal, 52, 1185-1211.
  8. Remillard, J.T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
  9. Robinson, T.J., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. (2014). The impact of open textbooks on secondary science learning outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 341-351.
  10. Taylor, J.A., Getty, S.R., Kowalski, S.M., Wilson, C.D., Carlson, J., & Van Scotter, P. (2015). An efficacy
  11. The Boston Consulting Group. (2013). The open education resources ecosystem: An evaluation of the OER movement’s current state and its progress toward mainstream adoption. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/library/the-open-education-resources-ecosystem/
  12. Tonks, D., Weston, S., Wiley, D., & Barbour, M. (2013). “Opening” a new kind of school: The story of the
  13. UNESCO. (2016). What are open educational resources (OERs)? Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-to-knowledge/openeducational-resources/what-are-open-educational-resources-oers/

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.