You are here:

Grit and Intention: Why Do Learners Complete MOOCs? ARTICLE

, Columbia University ; , University of Pennsylvania

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

In recent years there has been considerable interest in how many learners complete MOOCs, and what factors during usage can predict completion. Others, however, have argued that many learners never intend to complete MOOCs, and take MOOCs for other reasons. There has been qualitative research into why learners take MOOCs, but the link between learner goals and completion has not been fully established. In this paper, we study the relationship between learner intention to complete a MOOC and their actual completion status. We compare that relationship to the degree to which MOOC completion is predicted by other domain-general motivational factors such as grit, goal orientation, academic efficacy, and the need for cognition. We find that grit and goal orientation are associated with course completion, with grit predicting course completion independently from intention to complete, and with comparable strength.

Citation

Wang, Y. & Baker, R. (2018). Grit and Intention: Why Do Learners Complete MOOCs?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 19, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H.J., & Rosé, C.P. (2014). Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic
  2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  4. Ajzen, I., & Fisbbein, M. (1974). Factors influencing intentions and the intention-behavior relation. Human Relations, 27(1), 1–15.
  5. Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C.D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017).
  6. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and learner motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261.
  7. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Learners’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.
  8. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1987). Mothers’ beliefs about the role of ability and effort in school learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 409–414.
  9. Bandura, A. (1994). Self‐efficacy. New York: John Wiley& Sons.
  10. Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach Duke University’s first MOOC. Retrieved from http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/6216
  11. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., & Seaton, D.T. (2013). Studying learning
  12. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., & Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in
  13. Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Auld, D.P. (2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 349-364.
  14. Clow, D. (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 185-189). ACM.
  15. Cupitt, C., & Golshan, N. (2015). Participation in higher education online: Demographics, motivators, and grit. Paper presented at the STARS Conference 2015, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.unistars.org/papers/STARS2015/09C.pdf
  16. DeWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez, O.C.(2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. International Review of Research in Open& Distance Learning, 12(7), 94–115.
  17. Duckworth, A.L., & Eskreis-Winkler, L. (2013). True grit. APS Observer, 26(4).
  18. Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D.R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1087–1101. Retrieved from http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~duckwort/images/Grit%20JPSP.pdf
  19. Duckworth, A.L, & Quinn, P.D. (2009). Development and validation of the short Grit Scale (GritS). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174. Retrieved from http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~duckwort/images/Duckworth%20and%20Quinn.pdf
  20. Dweck, C.S. (2010). Mind-Sets and Equitable Education. Principal Leadership, 10(5), 26–29.
  21. Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256.
  22. Elias, S.M., & Loomis, R.J. (2002). Utilizing need for cognition and perceived self‐efficacy to predict academic performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(8), 1687–1702.
  23. Elliot, A.J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.
  24. Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 968.
  25. Elliot, A.J., McGregor, H.A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 549.
  26. Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E.P., Beal, S.A., & Duckworth, A.L. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(36), 1– 12.
  27. Eservel, U.Y. (2014). IT-enabled knowledge creation for open innovation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(11), 805.
  28. Evans, C.J., Kirby, J.R., & Fabrigar, L.R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university learners. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 507–528.
  29. Fleischhauer, M., Enge, S., Brocke, B., Ullrich, J., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A. (2010). Same or different?
  30. Hackett, G., & Betz, N.E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261–273.
  31. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133–160.
  32. Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164-177.
  33. Li, D., Browne, G.J., & Wetherbe, J.C. (2006). Why do internet users stick with a specific website? A relationship perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(4), 105-141.
  34. McBroom, W.H., & Reid, F.W. (1992). Towards a reconceptualization of attitude–behavior consistency. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 205–16.
  35. Meece, J.L., Anderman, E.M., & Anderman, L.H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.
  36. Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of learners and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92–102. Http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033
  37. Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., & Lent, R.W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30.
  38. Murayama, K., Elliot, A.J., & Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and
  39. Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (1998). “Inclined abstainers”: A problem for predicting health-related behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 151–65.
  40. Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12).
  41. Perneger, T.V. (1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 316(7139).
  42. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3).
  43. Pintrich, P.L., & Schunk, D.H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application.
  44. Ryan, A.M., Gheen, M.H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An
  45. Ryan, A.M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’
  46. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. DOI> 10.1080/14792772143000003
">Https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
  • Vallerand, R.J., Houlfort, N., & Forest, J. (2014). Passion for work: Determinants and outcomes. In M.
  • Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2015). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1).
  • Wang, Y., Paquette, L., & Baker, R. (2014). A longitudinal study on learner career advancement in MOOCs. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(3), 203-206.
  • Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment:
  • These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.