You are here:

Open Educational Resources: Challenges and Opportunities in Indian Primary Education

, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press


Education is a fundamental human right, yet one fifth of the world’s population lives with poor literacy. India is home to the largest number of illiterate people, with infrastructural, cultural, and socio-economic factors hindering equitable access to quality education. Due to the rapidly growing technology and Internet usage in the country, open educational resources (OER) are increasingly being used as a vital tool to help transcend barriers to child literacy, also aiding in educational attainment. While an array of scholarly works provides evidence of the potential in OER to influence higher education outcomes in developing nations, academic analysis of their impact on primary level education attainment has been minimal. This paper retrieve lessons from three children’s content providing organizations to understand the opportunities and challenges of OER in primary-level education in developing nations with similar cultural, infrastructural, and socio-economic issues. While the findings of this study suggest that the use of OER allows for greater distribution and scale across different cultural and linguistic settings, particularly in rural and remote regions, they also warn against the adaptation and pedagogical barriers of OER into societies where traditional modes of education are established and trusted.


Ganapathi, J. (2018). Open Educational Resources: Challenges and Opportunities in Indian Primary Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved January 17, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Asfaha, Y.M., Beckman, D.M., Kurvers, J.J.H., & Kroon, S. (2009). L2 reading in multilingual
  2. Baral, D. (2012). Redefining rural marketing: An approach towards micro entrepreneurship with special reference to Shakti. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 1(4). Retrieved from,%20Dr.%20S.K.%20Baral.pdf
  3. Białecki, I., Jakubowski, M., & Wisniewski, J. (2017). Education policy in Poland: The impact of PISA (and other international studies). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 167-174.
  4. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  5. D'Antoni, S. (2009). Open educational resources: Reviewing initiatives and issues. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 3-10.
  6. Doğan, T.G., & Eby, G. (2014). Constructing a flexible distance learning environment through a sociotechnical perspective. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD), 6(4), 47-66.
  7. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
  8. Hennessy, S., Haßler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2016). Pedagogic change by Zambian primary school
  9. Jain, D., Sharma, S., & Shelly, G. (2012). Problem and aspects of technology in higher education (with
  10. Kanwar, A., Kodhandaraman, B., & Umar, A. (2010). Toward sustainable open education resources: A perspective from the global south. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 65-80.
  11. Knox, J. (2013). Five critiques of the open educational resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 821-832. Doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.774354
  12. Kowalski, E. (2008). Representations of linguistic and ethnocultural diversity in Poland's education
  13. Kumar, M.S.V. (2009). Open educational resources in India's national development. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 7784.
  14. Muegge, S., Mora, M., Hassin, K., & Pullin, A. (2008). A flat network for the unflat world: Open
  15. Nambeesan, G.B. (1996) Equity in education? Schooling of Dalit children in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(16/17). Retrieved from
  16. Natarajan, M. (2011). Exploring the e-resources for educational use. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 1(4), 193. Retrieved from
  17. Nyaga, S., & Anthonissen, C. (2012). Teaching in linguistically diverse classrooms: Difficulties in the
  18. Paran, A., & Williams, E. (2007). Editorial: Reading and literacy in developing countries. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 1-6.
  19. Peters, M.A. (2012). User created education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(10), 1041-1044.
  20. Salter, L. (2011). Preconditions for post-employment learning: Preliminary results from ongoing research. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(1), 24-41.
  21. Sharma, R.N., & Sharma, R.K. (1996). History of education in India. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers& Distributors.
  22. Singh, K.P., & Gill, M.S. (2015). Role and Users’ Approach to Social Networking Sites (SNSs): A Study of Universities of North India. The Electronic Library, 33(1), 19-34.
  23. Stacey, P. (2010) Foundation funded OER vs. Tax payer funded OER– A tale of two mandates. Barcelona: ED 2010 Proceedings. Retrieved from
  24. Stake, R.E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  25. Thakrar, J., Zinn, D., & Wolfenden, F. (2009). Harnessing open educational resources to the
  26. Thomas, D.R. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from
  27. Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
  28. Thorne, S. (2000) Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 3, 68-70.
  29. Tuomi, I. (2013). Open educational resources and the transformation of education. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 58-78. Doi:10.1111/ejed.12019
  30. UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. Education for All (EFA) Global Monitoring Report (GMR) 2013/4. Retrieved from
  31. Weller, M., De Los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, B., & McAndrew, P. (2015). The impact of OER on teaching and learning practice. Open Praxis, 7(4), 351-361. Doi:10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.227
  32. Whitworth, A., Mcindoe, S., & Whitworth, C. (2011). Teaching media and information literacy to
  33. Wolfenden, F., Buckler, A.S.H., & Keraro, F. (2012). OER adaptation and reuse across cultural

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact