You are here:

Technology Matters – The Impact of Transactional Distance on Satisfaction in Online Distance Learning

, , Department of Instructional Technology & Media FernUniversität in Hagen

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press


Transactional distance (TD), the perception of psychological distance between the student and his peers, his instructor/teacher, and the learning content, has long been a prominent construct in research on distance education. Today, distance education primarily takes place over the internet, with technology mediating engagement and communication. Because transactional distance in online distance learning will always rely on technologically-mediated communication or interaction, we argue that in order to get the full picture, this aspect of technological mediation needs to be considered. For this purpose, we introduce a new scale for measuring transactional distance between students and the learning technology (TDSTECH), comprised of two interrelated dimensions. Reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity suggest a suitable scale. Preliminary inferential analyses are conducted with multiple linear regression and mediation analysis. Regression models show that TDSTECH is the single most important predictor of satisfaction in this population. This may have important implications for practitioners trying design and facilitate satisfying online distance learning experiences. Also, mediator analysis reveals that TDSTECH mediates the relationship between TD student-teacher and satisfaction, but not for TD student-content. Surprisingly, TD student-student shows no significant relationship with satisfaction. Implications for practice and further research are discussed.


Weidlich, J. & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Technology Matters – The Impact of Transactional Distance on Satisfaction in Online Distance Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved January 17, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Adamopoulos, P. (2013). What makes a great mooc? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention
  2. Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e‐learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30(1), 5-21.
  3. Bevan, N., Carter, J., & Harker, S. (2015). ISO 9241-11 revised: What have we learnt about usability since 1998? In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 143-151).
  4. Croxton, R.A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314.
  5. Ekwunife-Orakwue, K.C., & Teng, T.L. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic
  6. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2008). Beyond the theoretical impasse: Extending the applications of
  7. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.
  8. Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A
  9. Hillman, D.C.A., Willis, D.J., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner‐interface interaction in distance
  10. Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2012). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-12.
  11. Howard, S.K., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2016). Student rules: Exploring patterns of students’ computer-efficacy and engagement with digital technologies in learning. Computers& Education, 101, 29-42.
  12. Hung, M.L., Chou, C., Chen, C.H., & Own, Z.Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers& Education, 55(3), 1080-1090.
  13. International Organization for Standardization. (2016). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO Standard No. 9241-11). Retrieved from
  14. Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B.E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online
  15. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). Http://
  16. Joo, Y.J., Lim, K.Y., & Kim, E.K. (2011). Online university students' satisfaction and persistence:
  17. Joo, Y.J., Lim, K.Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers& Education, 62, 149-158.
  18. Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online
  19. Maddrell, J.A., Morrison, G.R., & Watson, G.S. (2017). Presence and learning in a community of inquiry. Distance Education, 38(2), 245-258.
  20. Moore, M.G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
  21. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. Theoretical principles of distance education, 1, 22-38.
  22. O’Brien, R.M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality& Quantity, 41(5), 673-690.
  23. Park, J.H., & Choi, H.J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners' decision to dropout or persist in online learning. Educational Technology& Society, 12(4), 207-217.
  24. Paul, R.C., Swart, W., Zhang, A.M., & MacLeod, K.R. (2015). Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional
  25. Richardson, J.C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students'
  26. Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.
  27. Sobel, M.E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology, 16, 159-186.
  28. Sun, J. (2016). Multi-dimensional alignment between online instruction and course technology: A learner-centered perspective. Computers& Education, 101, 102-114.
  29. Swart, W., MacLeod, K., Paul, R., Zhang, A., & Gagulic, M. (2014). Relative proximity theory:
  30. Zhang, A.M. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact