You are here:

Tablets and Trees: Equipping Forestry Students with Mobile Tools for Learning in and Out of Classroom | Des tablettes et des arbres: quiper les tudiants en foresterie d'outils mobiles pour apprendre en et hors de la salle de classe ARTICLE


CJLT Volume 44, Number 1, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education


This paper presents the case of how a department of applied science went about implementing a tablet initiative in a two-year diploma program. Tablets were a required tool for entry into the program with a goal of reducing textbook purchase costs for students, mirroring industry standard practices in mobile device usage, and enabling collaborative and active learning in the classroom. Based on surveys, interviews, and classroom observations we found that the integration of tablets, when explicitly positioned as a teaching and learning tool supported new forms of peer-to-peer collaboration, encouraged the use of open educational resources, and shifted traditional classroom dynamics reformulating the division of labour between faculty and students. Using activity theory as a lens for the analysis, we examine how the introduction of this tool changes the system of activity and impacts the division of labour, community, and rules both within and beyond the classroom.Cet article prsente la faon dont un dpartement de sciences appliques a mis en \u0153uvre un projet d\u2019intgration de tablettes dans un programme de deux ans menant un diplme. Les tablettes taient requises pour entrer dans le programme, et ce, afin de rduire les cots d'achat de manuels scolaires, de reflter les pratiques courantes de l'industrie en ce qui concerne l'utilisation des appareils mobiles, et de faciliter un apprentissage collaboratif et actif en classe. En nous basant sur des sondages, des entrevues et des observations en classe, nous avons constat que l'intgration des tablettes, explicitement positionnes comme outils d'enseignement et d'apprentissage, favorisait de nouvelles formes de collaboration entre pairs, encourageait l'utilisation de ressources ducatives libres et modifiait la dynamique traditionnelle des salles de classe en redfinissant la division du travail entre professeurs et tudiants. En nous appuyant sur la thorie de l\u2019activit, nous examinons comment l'introduction de cet outil modifie le systme


Paskevicius, M. & Knaack, L. (2018). Tablets and Trees: Equipping Forestry Students with Mobile Tools for Learning in and Out of Classroom | Des tablettes et des arbres: quiper les tudiants en foresterie d'outils mobiles pour apprendre en et hors de la salle de classe. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 44(1),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved October 17, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Afreen, R. (2014). Bring your own device (BYOD) in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science, 3(1), 233-236.
  2. Alyahya, S., & Gall, J. E. (2012). IPads in education: A qualitative study of students’ attitudes and experiences. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, (Vol. 2012, pp. 1266-1271).
  3. Cochrane, T., Narayan, V., & Oldfield, J. (2013). IPadagogy: Appropriating the iPad within pedagogical contexts. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation., 7(1), 48-65.
  4. De Vries, F., & Thuss, F. (2013). Mobile devices and apps as accelerators for OER. In R. Jacobi, H. Jelgerhuis, & N. Van der Woert (Eds.), Trendreport Open Educational Resources 2013 (pp. 49–52). Utrecht, Netherlands: SURF Foundation.
  5. Doubleday, A. F., & Wille, S. J. (2014). We are what we do: Examining learner-generated content in the anatomy laboratory through the lens of activity theory. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(5), 361369.
  6. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding (Doctoral Dissertation). Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki. Retrieved from
  7. Engeström, Y. (1995). Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: an activity-theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 7(5), 395–412. Doi:10.1016/0933-3657(95)00012-U
  8. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Fahlman, D. (2013). Examining informal learning using mobile devices in the healthcare workplace. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(4).
  10. Finkelstein, A., Winer, L., Buddle, C., & Ernst, C. (2013). Tablets in the forest: Mobile technology for inquiry-based learning. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved from
  11. S. (2015). Enhancing Fieldwork Learning Using Mobile Technologies. Basel, Switzerland: Springer, International Publishing.
  12. Geist, E. (2011). The game changer: Using Ipads in college teacher education classes. College Student Journal, 45(4), 758.
  13. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.
  14. Hein, T. (2011). Mobile computing usage on the rise. Canadian Forest Industries. Retrieved from
  15. Herrington, J., & Parker, J. (2013). Emerging technologies as cognitive tools for authentic learning: Emerging technologies for authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 607-615.
  16. Hill, J., Nuss, M., Middendorf, B., Cervero, R., & Gaines, J. (2012). Using iPads to enhance teaching and learning in third-year medical clerkships. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1482-1488).
  17. Jhangiani, R. S., Pitt, R., Hendricks, C., Key, J., & Lalonde, C. (2016). Exploring faculty use of open educational resources at British Columbia post-secondary institutions. BCcampus Research Report. Retrieved from
  18. Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  19. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Affordances in HCI: Toward a Mediated Action Perspective. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 967-976). ACM. Retrieved from
  20. Karakus, T. (2014). Practices and potential of activity theory for educational technology research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 151-160). New York, NY: Springer.
  21. Mang, C. F., & Wardley, L. J. (2012). Effective adoption of tablets in post-secondary education: Recommendations based on a trial of iPads in university classes. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11(1), 301-317.
  22. McCoy, B. R. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 7(1), 5-32.
  23. McGreal, R. (2015). Why open educational resources are needed in iPad and other mobile learning contexts. In N. Souleles & C. Pillar (Eds.), iPad use in fieldwork: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the use of iPads in higher education (IHE2014) (pp. 110-125). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved from
  24. Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 11591168.
  25. Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2014). Activity theory perspectives on technology in higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  26. Nilson, L. B., & Weaver, B. E. (2005). Enhancing learning with laptops in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Students, computers and learning: making the connection. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from
  28. Parks, S. (2000). Same task, different activities: Issues of investment identity, and use of strategy. TESL Canada Journal, 17(2), 21.
  29. Pratihast, A. K., Souza, C., Herold, M., & Ribbe, L. (2012). Application of mobile devices for community based forest monitoring. Presented at the Sensing a Changing World II, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Retrieved from
  30. Ravizza, S. M., Uitvlugt, M. G., & Fenn, K. M. (2017). Logged in and zoned out. Psychological Science, 28(2), 171-180.
  31. Reynolds, R. (2011). Trends influencing the growth of digital textbooks in us higher education. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27(2), 178-187.
  32. Scanlon, E., Jones, A., & Waycott, J. (2005). Mobile technologies: prospects for their use in learning in informal science settings. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2005(2).
  33. Senack, E. (2014). Fixing the broken textbook market: how students respond to high textbook costs and demand alternatives. The Student Public Interest Research Groups. Center for Public Interest Research. Retrieved from
  34. Sharples, M., & Spikol, D. (2017). Mobile learning. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, & R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 89–96). Basel, Switzerland: Springer, International Publishing.
  35. Traxler, J. (2010). Students and mobile devices. ALT-J, 18(2), 149–160.
  36. Whalley, B. W., France, D., Park, J. R., Mauchline, A. L., Powell, V., & Welsch, K. (2015). IPad use in fieldwork: formal and informal use to enhance pedagogical practice in a bring your own technology world. In N. Souleles & C. Pillar (Eds.), iPad use in fieldwork: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the use of iPads in higher education; (pp. 110–125). England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact