You are here:

Connecting OER With Mandatory Textbooks in an EFL Classroom: A Language Theory–Based Material Adoption ARTICLE

, Beijing Foreign Studies University

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) theory focuses on developing language learners\u2019 meta-linguistic understanding of the interrelation among linguistic form (grammar/vocabulary), meaning, and context. Guided by SFL when using a mandatory textbook and open educational resources, this study investigates how exposure to this blended teaching and learning context may impact English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners\u2019 adjustment to materials used in their learning, as well as their learning practices. By drawing on the written documents of four students written, and on interviews conducted with these students over an academic semester in an EFL writing course, this qualitative study, through content analysis and discourse analysis, shows that the SFL theory-based material adoption did a good job of supporting EFL students in their internalization of language knowledge from both open educational resources and traditional textbooks, while also enabling students to use materials flexibly instead of passively following along with the content in the mandatory textbook. The flexibility of the students participating in the study was particularly reflected by their ability to construct principled knowledge informed by SFL and to independently apply such knowledge to effectively navigate literacy practices (e.g., critical construction and deconstruction of discourses).

Citation

Zhang, X. (2018). Connecting OER With Mandatory Textbooks in an EFL Classroom: A Language Theory–Based Material Adoption. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers& Education, 47(4), 373–398. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2004.10.013
  2. Allen, H.W. (2008). Textbook materials and foreign language teaching: Perspectives from the classroom. NECTFL Review, 62, 5–28. Retrieved from http://www.nectfl.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/review62.pdf#page=11
  3. Ariza, E.N., & Hancock, S. (2003). Second language acquisition theories as a framework for creating
  4. Bawarshi, A.S., & Reiff, M.J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
  5. Blommaert, J. (2008). Bernstein and poetics revisited: Voice, globalisation and education. Discourse& Society, 19(4), 425-451.
  6. Blyth, C. (2014). Open educational resources and the new classroom ecology. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 662-664.
  7. Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 477–497. Doi:10.1558/cj.v23i3.477-497
  8. Donato, R., & McCormic, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 454–464.
  9. Dyson, A.H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
  10. Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourse in the ESL classroom. London: Continuum.
  11. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
  12. Harman, R. (2013). Intertextuality in genre-register pedagogies: Building the field in L2 fifth grade literary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 125–140.
  13. Hilton, J. (2016). OER and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590.
  14. Macken-Horarik, M. (2012). Why school English needs a “good enough” grammatics (and not more grammar). Changing English, 19(2):179–194.
  15. Menkabu, A., & Harwood, N. (2014). Teachers’ conceptualization and use of the textbook on a medical English course. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 145–177). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Doi:
  16. Römer, U. (2004). Comparing real and ideal language learner input: the use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Stewart (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp. 151–168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Doi:
  17. Swami, J.A. (2008). Sensitizing ESL learners to genre. TESL-EJ, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp/information/tesl-ej/ej47/a9.html
  18. Symons, C., Palincsar, A.S., & Schleppegrell, M.J. (2017). Fourth-grade emergent bilinguals’ uses of functional grammar analysis to talk about text. Learning and Instruction, 52, 102–111.
  19. You, X. (2004). “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese University. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97–110.
  20. Zhang, X. (2017). Exploring a novice Chinese EFL teacher’s writing beliefs and practices: A systemic functional perspective. International Journal of Language Studies, 11 (1), 95-118. Retrieved from http://www.ijls.net/inpress/zhang111.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.