You are here:

Designing Continuing Professional Development MOOCs to promote the adoption of OER and OEP ARTICLE

, , ,

Open Praxis Volume 10, Number 2, ISSN 1369-9997 e-ISSN 1369-9997 Publisher: International Council for Open and Distance Education

Abstract

There is growing interest in the adoption of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP) in a variety of contexts. Continuing professional development (CPD) among practitioners in the effective adoption of OER and OEP is critical in this scenario. Massive open online courses (MOOCs), which also grew as part of the open education movement, provide a feasible means for this purpose. MOOCs are considered a \u2018disruptive innovation\u2019 in making free and open learning opportunities accessible to large numbers. Yet, the design of an effective massive online course that is as robust as a great online course with smaller student numbers where good principles of teaching and learning are maintained, is very challenging. Most contemporary MOOCs tend to have a content-driven focus of knowledge transmission, deviating from its original focus of knowledge generation. With the intention of providing learning experiences to promote learner engagement with OER, rather than presenting content about OER, we designed four CPD MOOCs to support the integration of OER and adoption OEP by practitioners based on a scenario-based learning (SBL) approach. This paper presents the analysis and design phases of this process, discussing the challenges faced and innovative strategies adopted in our pursuit to answer the question, “How best to design effective MOOCs on OER and OEP for continuing professional development of practitioners?\u201d

Citation

Karunanayaka, S., Naidu, S., Rajendra, J.C.N. & Ariadurai, S.A. (2018). Designing Continuing Professional Development MOOCs to promote the adoption of OER and OEP. Open Praxis, 10(2), 179-190. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved October 16, 2018 from .

This record was imported from OpenPraxis on April 30, 2018. [Original Record]

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning In T. Anderson (Ed.) The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.) (pp 45-74). Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
  2. Bates, A.W. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. Vancouver BC: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
  3. Bayne, S. & Ross, J. (2014). The pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course: the UK view. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/hea_edinburgh_mooc_web_240314_1.pdf Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2012). JISC open practices: Briefing paper (1–12). Retrieved from https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/58444186/Open%20Practices%20
  4. CEMCA (2014). Professional development programme on OER-based eLearning. New Delhi: CEMCA. Retrieved from http://cemca.org.in/ckfinder/userfiles/files/OER%20-%20Modules_Low.pdf Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), Art-18. Retrieved from https://www-jime.
  5. Evans, S. & Myrick, J.G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295–311.
  6. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
  7. Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999), Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
  8. Karunanayaka, S., Naidu, S., Rajendra, J., & Ratnayake, H. (2015). From OER to OEP: Shifting Practitioner Perspectives and Practices with Innovative Learning Experience Design. Open Praxis, 7(4), 339–350. Https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.252Karunanayaka,S.P.,Naidu,S.,Rajendra,J., & Ratnayake, H. (2017). Designing reflective practice in the context of OER-based eLearning. Journal of Learning for Development, 4(2), 143–160.
  9. Merrill, M.D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research& Development, 50(3), 43–59.
  10. Naidu, S. (2007). Instructional designs for distance education. In M.G. Moore (Ed.). Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). (pp. 247–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  11. Naidu, S. (2010). Using scenario-based learning to promote situated learning and develop professional knowledge. In E.P. Errington (Ed.). Preparing graduates for the professions using scenariobased learning (pp. 39–49). Brisbane: Post Pressed.
  12. Naidu, S. (2015). Lessons we are not learning or choosing to ignore! Distance Education, 36(3), , S. & Karunanayaka, S. (2014). Engines of Education: Integrating OER in Learning and Teaching. In S. Karunanayaka & S. Naidu (Eds). Integrating OER in Educational Practice: Practitioner Stories. The Open University of Sri Lanka. (pp 3–22). Retrieved from http://www.ou.ac.lk/home/images/
  13. Naidu, S. & Oliver, M. (1999). Critical incident-based computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 27(5), 329-354.
  14. Novak, J.D. & Cañas, A.J. (2007). Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29–42. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/pub l ica t ion/228761562_Theoret ica l_or ig ins_of_concept_maps_how_to_construct_them_ and_uses_in_education
  15. Pickering, J.D. & Swinnerton, B.J. (2017). An Anatomy Massive Open Online Course as a Continuing Professional Development Tool for Healthcare Professionals. Medical Science Educator, 27(2), 243–252. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0383-7Reeves,T.C.(2006).Designresearch from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney& N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). London: Routledge.
  16. Siemens, G. (2012, June 3). What is the theory that underpins our moocs? [Weblog]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-the-theory-that-underpins-our-moocs/ Siemens, G. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses: Innovation in Education? Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/pub_PS_OER-IRP_CH1.pdf
  17. Spector, J.M. & Koszalka, T.A. (2004). The DEEP Methodology for assessing learning in complex domains (Final report to the National Science Foundation Evaluative Research and Evaluation Capacity Building). New York: Syracause University.
  18. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  19. Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education: A White paper. JISC CETIS Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.