Mapping the open education landscape: citation network analysis of historical open and distance education research ARTICLE
Open Praxis Volume 10, Number 2, ISSN 1369-9997 e-ISSN 1369-9997 Publisher: International Council for Open and Distance Education
The term open education has recently been used to refer to topics such as Open Educational Resources (OERs) and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Historically its roots lie in civil approaches to education and open universities, but this research is rarely referenced or acknowledged in current interpretations. In this article the antecedents of the modern open educational movement are examined, as the basis for connecting the various strands of research. Using a citation analysis method the key references are extracted and their relationships mapped. This work reveals eight distinct sub-topics within the broad open education area, with relatively little overlap. The implications for this are discussed and methods of improving inter-topic research are proposed.
Weller, M., Jordan, K., DeVries, I. & Rolfe, V. (2018). Mapping the open education landscape: citation network analysis of historical open and distance education research. Open Praxis, 10(2), 109-126. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved October 16, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183582/.
- Atkins, D.E., Brown, J.S. & Hammond, A.L. (2007). A review of the Open Educational Resources
- Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J. & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892-895.
- Brown, J.S. & Adler, R.P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0.
- Calder, J. (2000). Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. International Review of Research in Open EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32.
- Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M. & Wiley, D.A. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling uni-versal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1-11.
- Chafkin, M. (2013). Udacity’s Sebastian Thrun, godfather of free online education, changes course. Fast Company, November 14th 2013. Retrieved from http://www.fastcompany.com/3021473/ Udacity-sebastian-thrun-uphill-climb
- Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in Higher Education. International Review of Research in Online and Distributed Learning, 18(5). Http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
- Dalsgaard, C. & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of openness: Beyond the course as an open format in online education. International Review of Research in Online and Distributed Learning, 16(6). Http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2146
- Daniel, J. (1996). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher educa-tion. London: Kogan Page.
- Daniel, J. (2017). Where do open universities think they are going? Keynote presentation, European
- Ehlers, U-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1-10.
- Evans, T. & Nation, D. (1992). Theorising open and distance education. Open Learning: The journal of open, distance and e-learning, 7(2), 3-13.
- Fini, A., Formiconi, A., Giorni, A., Pirruccello, N.S., Spadavecchia, E. & Zibordi, E. (2008). IntroOpenEd 2007: An experience on open education by a virtual community of teachers. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4(1). Https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/266Friesen,N.& Murray, J. (2013). “Open learning 2.0”? Aligning student, teacher and content for openness in Education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(2), 200-207.
- Geser, G. (2007). Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS roadmap. Open e-Learning Con-tent Observatory Services. Retrieved from http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf Godin, S. (2016, March 2). “Will this be on the test?” Rethinking online education. The Startup. Retrieved from https://medium.com/swlh/will-this-be-on-the-test-237ae9cc53b4
- Gourlay, L. (2015). Open education as a “heterotopia of desire”. Learning, Media& Technology, 40(3), 310-327. Https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1029941Guri-Rozenblit,S.(1993).Differentiatingbetween distance/open education systems: Parameters for
- Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47.
- Harnad, S. & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. Non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
- Havemann, L. (2016). Open educational resources. In: Peters, M.A. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
- Hollands, F., & Tirthali, D. (2014). Resource requirements and costs of developing and delivering MOOCs. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(5). Http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1901
- Hug, T. (2016). Defining openness in education. Living Reference Work Entry, Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-6.
- Hyland, J.T. (1979). Open education: a slogan examined. Educational Studies, 6, 35-41.
- Hylen, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/37351085.pdf
- Iiyoshi, T. & Kumar, V.M.S. (Eds.) (2008). Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S. & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE 9(6), e98679.
- Jenkins, H., Clinton K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A.J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges
- Koller, D. (2012). ‘What we’re learning from online education’. TED. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/daphne_koller_what_we_re_learning_from_online_education
- Kolowich, S. (2013). MOOCs are largely reaching privileged learners, survey finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, November 20th, 2013. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/ Moocs-are-reaching-only-privileged-learners-survey-finds/48567
- Lane, A. & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 952–962. Https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8535.2010.01119.xLaurillard,D.(1993).Rethinkinguniversity teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational
- Longstaff, E. (2014). The prehistory of MOOCs: Inclusive and exclusive access in the cyclical
- McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. University of Prince Edward Island. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/MOOC_Final.pdf
- OECD (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/38654317.pdf Oliver, M. (2015). From openness to permeability: reframing open education in terms of positive liberty in the enactment of academic practices. Learning, Media& Technology, 40(3), 365-384.
- Paul, R. (2016). Open Universities: a storied past but an uncertain future? Distance Education in China, 11, 5-16.
- Peter, S. & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14. Http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
- Plowden (1967). Children and their Primary Schools (The Plowden report). London: Department of Education and Science.
- Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. In: Punie, Y. (ed). EUR 28775 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/159770Resnick,L.B.(1972).OpenEducation: Some Tasks for Technology. Educational Technology, 12(1), 70-76. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED078694
- Rolfe, V. (2016). Open, but not for criticism? #opened16, Richmond, Virginia, USA, November 2016. Open Praxis, vol. 10 issue 2, April–June 2018, pp. 109–126
- Savonick, D. & Davidson, C. (2016). Gender bias in academe: An annotated bibliography of important recent studies. LSE Impact Blog, 8th March 2016. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/ Impactofsocialsciences/2016/03/08/gender-bias-in-academe-an-annotated-bibliography/
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/
- Smith, M.L. & Seward, R. (2017). Openness as social praxis. First Monday, 22(4).
- Suber, P. (2004). Open Access overview. Retrieved from https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
- Tait, J. (2004). The tutor/facilitator role in student retention. Open Learning: The Journal of Open,
- Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from Higher Education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review Distance and e-Learning, 19(1), 97-109.
- Traub, R.E., Weiss, J., Fisher, C.W. & Musella, D. (1972). Closure on openness: Describing and quantifying open education. Interchange, 3(2), 69-84.
- UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of OpenCourseware for Higher Education in developing coun-tries: Final report. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf
- UNESCO (2017). Second world OER congress Ljubljana OER action plan. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ljubljana_oer_action_plan_2017.pdf
- Veletsianos, G. (2012). Higher education scholars participation and practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 336-349. Https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2729.2011.00449.xVygotsky,L.S.(1978).Mindin society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Weller, M. (2004). Models of large scale e-learning. JALN, 8(4), 83-92.
- Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. London: Bloomsbury.
- Weller, M. (2014). The battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn’ t feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press. Https://doi.org/10.5334/bamWeller,M.(2016).Differentaspects of the emerging OER discipline. Revista Educacao e Cultura Contemporanea, 13(31), 404-418.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wiley, D. (2007). On the sustainability of open educational resource initiatives in higher education. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/38645447.pdf Wiley, D. (2013, October 21). What is Open Pedagogy? Iterating toward openness. Retrieved from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2975
- Wiley, D. (2014, March 5). The access compromise and the 5th R. Iterating toward openness. Retrieved from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221 Wiley D (2017, May 2). OER-Enabled Pedagogy. Iterating toward openness. Retrieved from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/5009
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.