You are here:

The potential role of Open Educational Practice policy in transforming Australian higher education ARTICLE

,

Open Praxis Volume 10, Number 2, ISSN 1369-9997 e-ISSN 1369-9997 Publisher: International Council for Open and Distance Education

Abstract

Open Educational Practices (OEP) have played an important role in assisting educational institutions and governments worldwide to meet their current and future educational targets in widening participation, lowering costs, improving the quality of learning and teaching and promoting social inclusion and participatory democracy. There have been some important OEP developments in Australia, but unfortunately the potential of OEP to meet some of the national educational targets has not been fully realised and acknowledged yet, in ways that many countries around the world have. This paper will gather, discuss, and analyse some key national and international policies and documentation available as an attempt to provide a solid foundation for a call to action for OEP in Australia, which will hopefully be an instrument to assist and connect practitioners and policy makers in higher education.

Citation

Bossu, C. & Stagg, A. (2018). The potential role of Open Educational Practice policy in transforming Australian higher education. Open Praxis, 10(2), 145-157. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved October 17, 2018 from .

This record was imported from OpenPraxis on April 30, 2018. [Original Record]

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Analysis and Policy Observatory (2008). Academic freedom in Australia. Australian Review of Public Affairs, 28 December 2008. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/node/1614 Australian Government (2003). Higher Education Support Act 2003. Federal Register of Legislation. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2004A01234
  2. Australian Government (2016). Driving Innovation, Fairness and Excellence in Australian Higher Education. Canber ra: Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/driving-innovation-fairness-and-excellence-australian-ed-uca tion
  3. Bossu, C., Brown, M., & Bull, D. (2014). Adoption, use and management of Open Educational Resources to enhance teaching and learning in Australia. Sydney: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/CG10_1687_Bossu_Report_2014.pdf
  4. Bossu, C., Bull, D., & Brown, M. (2015). Enabling Open Education: A Feasibility Protocol for Australian Higher Education. In C. Bonk, M. Lee, T. Reeves& T. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and Open Education Around the World. Routledge.
  5. Bossu, C., & Fountain, W. (2015). Capacity-building in open education: an Australian approach. Open Praxis, 7(2), 123-132. , D., Kandlbinder, P.,... Uys, P. (2016). A national strategy to promote Open Educational Practices in higher education in Australia. Paper presented at the 33rd International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE 2016): Show Me The Learning, Adelaide, SA. Retrieved from http://2016conference.ascilite.org/wp-content/uploads/ASCILITE2016-full-proceedings-Updated-1512.pdf
  6. Brabeck, M. (2008). Why We Need ‘Translational’ Research. Education Week, 27(38), 28-36. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/05/21/38brabeck.h27.html
  7. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education: Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A32134 Commonwealth of Learning (2015). Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in Higher Education (2nd ed.). Canada: UNESCO/Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002136/213605e.pdf
  8. Connell, R. (2013). Why do market ‘reforms’ persistently increase inequality? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 279-285.
  9. D’Antoni, S. (2008). Open Educational Resources: The Way Forward. Deliberations of an International Community of Interest. Retrieved from http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/oer-way-forward-final-version.pdf
  10. Dawkins, J. (1988). Higher education: a policy statement. Canberra: Australian government publication service.
  11. Ewan, C. (2016). Higher Education Standards in a Disaggregated Learning Environment. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from http://altf.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/08/Ewan_C_HESP_Fellow_ReporT_2016.pdf
  12. Healey, M., Bradford, M., Roberts, C., & Knight, Y. (2013). Collaborative discipline-based curriculum change: applying Change Academy processes at department level. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 31-44. ., & Gide, E. (2016). Funding Higher Education in Australia: A Comprehensive Analysis of Income Share Agreement as an Alternative to Income Contingent Loans. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(1). Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.org/
  13. James, R. (2012). Social inclusion in a globalised higher education environment: The issue of equitable access to university in Australia. In T. Basit & S. Tomlinson (eds.). Social inclusion and higher education (pp. 83-108). Bristol: Policy Press.
  14. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36. Https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404Mitchell,P.(2016).Fromconcept to classroom. What is translational research? Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
  15. Naylor, R., & James, R. (2015). Systemic equity challenges: An overview of the role of Australian universities in student equity and social inclusion. In M. Shah, A. Bennett& E. Southgate (Eds). Widening Higher Education Participation (pp. 1-13). United States: Elsevier.
  16. Open Educational Quality Initiative (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgec loud.org/files/
  17. Picasso, V., & Phelan, L. (2014). The evolution of open access to research and data in Australian higher education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 11(3), 122-133. Http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i3.2076Seaman, J. & Seaman, J. (2017). Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/
  18. Stagg, A., & Bossu, C. (2016). Educational policy and open educational practice in Australian Higher Education. In P. Blessinger & T. Bliss (Eds.), Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education (pp. 115-136). UK: Open Book Publishers. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/ Stable/J.ctt1sq5v9n.11
  19. UNESCO (2012). 2012 Paris OER Declaration. World Open Educational Resources (OER) Congress. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/Paris%20OER%20Declaration_01.pdf
  20. Universities Australia (2016). Keep It Clever : Policy Statement 2016. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/news/policy-papers/Keep-it-Clever--Policy-Statement-2016
  21. Webb, G. (2003). Management of academic development. In S. Panda (Ed.), Planning and Management in Distance Education (pp. 87-97). London: Kogan Page.
  22. Wethington, E., & Dunifon, R.E. (2012). Research for the public good. Applying the methods of translational research to improve human health and well-being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  23. Wills, S., Alexander, S., & Sadler, D. (2016). Students, Universities& Open Education. Sydney: Australia Australian Government Office for Learning& Teaching. Retrieved from http://openedoz.org/Wp-content/uploads/2016/04/OLT-Final-Report-Students-Universities-Open-Education.pdf
  24. Zajda, J. (2013). Globalisation and neo-liberalism as educational policy in Australia. In H. Yolcu & D. Turner (Eds.), Neoliberal educational reforms: a global analysis (pp. 234-252). New York: Taylor&

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.