Computer-Based Testing: Score Equivalence and Testing Administration Mode Preference in a Comparative Evaluation Study ARTICLE
Hooshang Khoshsima, Associate Professor, Language Department, Faculty of Management and Humanities, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran (Islamic Republic Of) ; Seyyed Hashemi Toroujeni, M.A. In TEFL, Language Department, Faculty of Management and Humanities, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran (Islamic Republic Of)
iJET Volume 12, Number 10, ISSN 1863-0383 Publisher: International Association of Online Engineering, Kassel, Germany
The empirical evidences show that two identical Computer-Based Testing (henceforth CBT) and Paper-and-Pencil-Based Testing (henceforth PBT) do not always result in the same scores. Such conclusions are referred to as \u201cthe effect of testing administration mode\u201d or \u201ctesting mode effect\u201d. Moderators such as individual differences (e.g., prior computer experience or computer attitude) have been investigated  to see if they influence test takers\u2019 performance. The Guidelines for Computer-Based Tests and Interpretations  recommended eliminating the possible effects of some moderator variables on test takers performance. This research was conducted to provide the required empirical evidences on the existence of distinctive effects caused by changing administration mode from conventional PBT to modern CBT. The relationship between testing mode preference on test takers\u2019 CBT performance was also examined. Two equivalent tests and two questionnaires were used. Using descriptive statistics and ANOVA, the findings demonstrated that two CBT and PBT sets of scores were comparable. Additionally, prior testing mode preference and gender had no significant effect on test takers\u2019 CBT score, and they were not considered the variables that might affect the performance on CBT.
Khoshsima, H. & Hashemi Toroujeni, S. (2017). Computer-Based Testing: Score Equivalence and Testing Administration Mode Preference in a Comparative Evaluation Study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(10), 35-55. Kassel, Germany: International Association of Online Engineering. Retrieved November 20, 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/181362/.
© 2017 IAOE