You are here:

Social Research Methods 2.0: e-learning design ARTICLE

,

Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Volume 13, Number 3, ISSN 1826-6223 e-ISSN 1826-6223 Publisher: Italian e-Learning Association

Abstract

Starting from a reflection on the aims and learning outcomes of the undergraduate course on social research methods and an analysis of the entry level skills of students, especially related to the reasoning with number, this article illustrates the design process of the course in a blended format. In particular, we present the activities of translation, implementation and innovation of the logical and conceptual structure of quantitative empirical research in the e-learning environment. From our point of view, the use of the e-learning platform allows learners to overcome the difficulties that they usually have in the quantitative analysis of social phenomena.

Citation

Catone, M. & Diana, P. (2017). Social Research Methods 2.0: e-learning design. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3),. Italian e-Learning Association. Retrieved August 19, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Andrews R., Haythornthwaite C., eds (2007), Handbook of E-learning Research, London, Sage.
  2. Bruschi B., Ercole M.L. (2005), Strategie per l’e-learning. Progettare e valutare la formazione on-line, Roma, Carocci.
  3. Calvani A., ed (2005), Rete, comunità e conoscenza: costruire e gestire dinamiche collaborative, Trento, Edizioni Erickson.
  4. Capogna S. (2014), Scuola, Università, E-learning: un’analisi sociologica, Roma, Armando Editore.
  5. Catone M.C., Diana P. (2015), E-learning to overcome the problems with the teaching of social sciences methodology, in: Falcinelli F., Minerva T.E Rivoltella P.C. (eds), Apertura e flessibilità nell’istruzione superiore oltre l’e-learning?Atti del Convegno SiremSiel2014. 142-144, Reggio Emilia, Sie-L Editore.
  6. Catone M.C., Diana P. (2016), L’esperienza del corso blended di metodologia delle scienze sociali: la voce degli studenti, in: Rui M., Messina L.E Minerva T. (eds), Teach different! Proceedings della Multiconferenza EMEMITALIA 2015. 379-382, Genova, Genova University Press.
  7. Corbetta P. (2003), Social research: Theory, methods and techniques, London, Sage.
  8. Dabbagh N. (2005), Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework, International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-44. Retrieved from http://www.sicet.org/journals/ijttl/issue0501/DabbaghVol1. Iss1.pp25-44.pdf.
  9. De Rossi M. (2015), Saperi pedagogico-metodologico-didattici, in: Messina L., De Rossi M. (eds), Tecnologie, formazione e didattica. 117-140, Roma, Carocci.
  10. Diana P., Catone M.C. (2016), E-learning in an Undergraduate Course in Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Reflections on Teaching, Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(2), 110-142, .
  11. Fedeli M. (2016), Coinvolgere gli studenti nelle pratiche didattiche: potere, dialogo e par tec ipaz ione , in: Fede liM. , Grion V. , Fr ison D. (eds) , Co invo lgere per apprendere. Metodi e tecniche partecipative per la formazione. 113-142, Lecce, Pensa Multimedia.
  12. Garrison D.R. (2011), E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice, London, Taylor& Francis.
  13. Jonassen D.H. (1994), Thinking Technology: Toward a constructivist design model, Educational Technology, 34(3), 34-37.
  14. Lewthwaite S., Nind M. (2016), Teaching research methods in the social sciences: expert perspectives on pedagogy and practice, British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(4), 1-17, .
  15. Mannay D., Wilcock, C. (2014), What students want? Exploring the role of the institution in supporting successful learning journeys in online distance education. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning Journal, 17(1), 49-63.
  16. Marradi A.(1996), Metodo come Arte, Quaderni di Sociologia, 40(10), 71-92.
  17. Meraviglia C. (2004), Metodologia delle scienze sociali. Un’introduzione, Roma, Carocci.
  18. Messina L., Tabone S., Tonegato P. (2015), Conoscenza sulle tecnologie, in: Messina L, De Rossi M. (eds), Tecnologie, formazione e didattica. 149-186, Roma, Carocci.
  19. Payne G., Williams M. (2011), Teaching Quantitative Methods. Getting the Basics Right, London, Sage.
  20. Ricolfi L. (1997), La ricerca qualitativa, Roma, Nuova Italia Scientifica.
  21. Scardamalia M., Bransford J., Kozma B., Quellmalz E. (2012), New assessments and environments for knowledge building, in: Griffin P., McGraw B., Care E. (eds) Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. 231-300 , Netherlands, Springer.
  22. Schön D.A. (1987), Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  23. Williams M., Sutton C. (2011), Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Teaching in Quantitative Methods, in: Payne G., Williams M. (eds), Teaching Quantitative Methods: getting the basics right. 66-84, London, Sage.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.