You are here:

A Framework for Seeking the Connections between Technology, Pedagogy and Culture: A study in the Maldives
article

Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Volume 21, Number 1, ISSN 1179-7665 e-ISSN 1179-7665 Publisher: Distance Education Association of New Zealand

Abstract

Educational technology researchers often overlooked the impact of culture on teachers\u2019 use of digital technologies in their pedagogical practices. This also includes a number of technology integration models (e.g. TAM and TPACK) that have failed to explain the connections between technology, pedagogy, and culture. This paper argues that teachers\u2019 pedagogical and technological practices cannot be fully understood without considering the social and cultural norms of their specific cultures. This study adopted an ethnographic methodology, linked with Bourdieu\u2019s (1977) habitus as a lens for exploring teacher educators\u2019 practices in the Maldives. Data were gathered from eleven teacher educators who work in a Maldivian university context: using interviews, observations, focus groups and the hanging out approach. Key findings demonstrated that teacher educators\u2019 pedagogical and technological practices were influenced by their own culture, early learning experiences in the Maldives, and their workplace (institutional context). Through this finding, this research proposes a framework, namely, Pedagogical and Technological Cultural Habitus (PATCH) for understanding teachers\u2019 pedagogical and technological habitus in various contexts. The PATCH framework is, theoretically useful for designing technology-oriented professional development for professionals in various pedagogical contexts including virtual and blended pedagogical spaces. It also contributes to TPACK framework by adding an outer layer to its current theorisation to represent teachers\u2019 backgrounds and habitus when examining their practices.

Citation

Adam, A. (2017). A Framework for Seeking the Connections between Technology, Pedagogy and Culture: A study in the Maldives. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 21(1), 35-51. Distance Education Association of New Zealand. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

This record was imported from the Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning on August 9, 2017. [Original Record]

The Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning is a publication of New Zealand Association for Open, Flexible and Distance Learning (DEANZ).

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adam, A.S. (2015). Understanding teacher educators’ pedagogical and technological cultural habitus (PATCH): An ethnographic study in the Maldives. (Doctor of Philosophy), The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10289/9552 Adams, C. (2012). PowerPoint and the pedagogy of digital media technologies. In M. Orey, S. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  2. Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human during their first 5 years. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 118–126.
  3. Bang, E., & Luft, J.A. (2013). Secondary science teachers’ use of technology in the classroom
  4. Baran, B. (2010). Experiences from the process of designing lessons with interactive whiteboard: Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 21-27. .
  5. Barton, A.C., & Berchini, C. (2013). Becoming an insider: Teaching science in urban settings. Press.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University
  7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative technologies as a pedagogical tool. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 51(3), 137–151.
  8. Chai, C.S., Ling Koh, J.H., Tsai, C.-C., & Lee Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modelling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers& Education, Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 91–104. Doi:10.1080/02607470903462222
  9. Cheng, M.M.H., Cheng, A.Y.N., & Tang, S.Y.F. (2010). Closing the gap between the theory and practice of teaching: Implications for teacher education programmes in Hong Kong.
  10. Ching Sing, C., Joyce Hwee Ling, K., & Chin-Chung, T. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 13(4), 63–73.
  11. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
  12. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  13. Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice. Retrieved from help? Waikato Journal of Education, 16(1), 21–34.
  14. Fetterman, D.M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-step (Vol. 17). California, CA: Sage.
  15. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New
  16. Goodall, J.H. (2003). What is interpretive ethnography? In R.P. Clair (Ed.), Expressions of ethnography: Novel approaches to qualitative methods (pp. 55–63). Albany, NY: State
  17. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  18. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.
  19. Harris, J.B., & Hofer, M.J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.
  20. Howard, S.K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372.
  21. Jenks, C. (1993). Culture. Florence, KY: Routledge.
  22. Ihmeideh, F.M. (2009). Barriers to the use of technology in Jordanian pre‐school settings. Http://www.csun.edu/~vceed002/ref/presentation/powerpoint/powerpoint_use_abuse.pdf Jones, A.M. (2003). The use and abuse of PowerPoint in teaching and learning in the life sciences: A personal overview. Bioscience Education, (2). Retrieved from
  23. Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a
  24. Kansanen, P., Tirri, K., & Meri, M. (2000). Teachers’ pedagogical thinking: Theoretical landscapes, practical challenges. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  25. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York,
  26. Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation
  27. Kukari, A.J. (2004). Cultural and religious experiences: Do they define teaching and learning for preservice teachers prior to teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 95–110.
  28. Lai, H.-M., & Chen, C.-P. (2011). Factors influencing secondary school teachers’ adoption of teaching blogs. Computers& Education, 56(4), 948–960.
  29. Loughran, J., & Northfield, J. (1996). Opening the classroom door: Teacher, researcher, learner. London, England: Routledge.
  30. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054
  31. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching& Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.
  32. Perkins, R. (2012). Are most investments for technology in schools wasted? TechTrends, 56(1), 10–11.
  33. Pierson, M., & Borthwick, A. (2010). Framing the assessment of educational technology professional development in a culture of learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 26(4), 126–131.
  34. Polly, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge London, England: Sage. (TPACK) through mathematics professional development. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 83–96.
  35. Richardson, M. (2001). Experience of culture. London, England: Sage.
  36. Pritchard, A. (2007). Effective teaching with internet technologies: Pedagogy and practice. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 21(1)
  37. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
  38. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Pedagogy and Education, 19(1), 3–16. Doi:10.1080/14759390903579257Researcher,15(2),4–14.
  39. Sipilä, K. (2010). The impact of laptop provision on teacher attitudes towards ICT. Technology, Education (Vol. 20, pp. 449–460). New York, NY: Springer.
  40. Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt& G.
  41. Sprankle, B. (2012). A plan for technology integration. Tech& Learning, 32(10), 38–40.
  42. Williams, G.M. (2006). Cultural, professional and personal influences on the teaching identity development of international teaching assistants. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
  43. Wolcott, H.F. (1987). On ethnographic intent. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum. 11(4), 397–418.
  44. Wong, M. (2005). A crosscultural comparison of teachers’ expressed beliefs about music education and their observed practices in classroom music teaching. Teachers and Teaching,
  45. Wright, N. (2014). A case for adapting and applying continuance theory to education:
  46. Zisow, M.A. (2000). Teaching style and technology. TechTrends, 44(4), 36–38. Understanding the role of student feedback in motivating teachers to persist with including digital technologies in learning. Teachers and Teaching, 21(4), 459–471.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.