You are here:

Building a Better Mousetrap: How Design-Based Research Was Used to Improve Homemade PowerPoint Games
ARTICLE

,

TLRPTIL Volume 60, Number 5, ISSN 8756-3894

Abstract

This paper is a review of a three-cycle, design-based research study that explored the relationship between the pedagogical research and the actual implementation of a game design project using Microsoft PowerPoint. Much of the initial literature on using homemade PowerPoint games showed no significant improvement in test scores when students created these low-tech games, despite the fact that the game project was grounded in sound pedagogical strategies. After each iteration changes were made to better reflect the recommendations from the literature, and at the end of the study, students creating games were performing statistically higher on tests than their counterparts who did not create games. Limitations of the study are discussed, as well as ideas for future research in the area of student-generated games as an instructional approach.

Citation

Siko, J.P. & Barbour, M.K. (2016). Building a Better Mousetrap: How Design-Based Research Was Used to Improve Homemade PowerPoint Games. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 60(5), 419-424. Retrieved November 15, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on February 24, 2017. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords