ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, ISBN 978-1-74138-403-1 Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Adoption of digital textbooks in higher education has been slower than was expected. This paper presents preliminary findings from a study conducted a t a small Australian university looking into how lecturers use digital textbooks. The pilot research indicated that the slow uptake may be explained by academic perception; participants indicated a strong preference for printed books, particularly related to capacity for accessing content. This pointed to a definitional property in that they largely conceived of an etextbook as a digital replica of a printed book. Not all lecturers were aware of enhanced digital textbooks, but generally agreed that it could be advantageous to have such content integrated into a central resource. Lecturers furthermore acknowledged the need to understand the affordances of educational technologies and their application to learning and teaching. Affordances theory is used to consider the knowledge required to effectively implement the full range of resources available in digital textbooks.
Smith, D., Brand, J.E. & Kinash, S. (2013). Turn on the book: Using affordance theory to understand the adoption of digital textbooks by university lecturers. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney (pp. 812-820). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved March 25, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171216/.
- Book Industry Study Group (2012, June 19). College faculty continue their love affair with print textbooks says new BISG study. Retrieved from http://www.bisg.org/news-5-750-press-releasecollege-faculty-continuetheir-love-affair-with-print-textbooks-says-new-bisg-study.php
- Day, D. & Lloyd, M. (2007). Affordances of online technologies: More than the properties of the technology. Australian Educational Computing, 22 (2), 17-21.
- Emerson,R., Fretz, R., & Shaw,L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Eysenck, M.W. (2001). Principles of cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press
- Gaffney, M. (2010). Enhancing teachers’ take-up of digital content: Factors and design principles in technology adoption. Retrieved from http://www.ndlrn.edu.au/verve/_resources/Enhancing_Teacher_Takeup_of_Digital_Content_Report.PDF Gardiner, E. & Musto, R.G. (2012). The electronic book. In Suarez, M. & Woudhuysen, H.R. (Eds). Oxford companion to the book (pp. 164-171). Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
- Heider, K., Laverick, D. & Bennett, B. (2009). Digital textbooks: The next paradigm shift in higher education?. AACEJ, 17(2), 103-112
- Horsley, M, Knight, B., and Huntley, H. (2010). The role of textbooks and other teaching and learning resources in higher education in Australia: change and continuity in supporting learning. IARTEM e-journal, 3 (2), 4361.
- Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
- Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
- Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 Horizon Report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium
- Kinash, S. (2006). Seeing beyond blindness. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P.A. Kirschner (Ed.) Three worlds of CSCL Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, Netherlands:
- Kostick, A. (2012, March 5).Digital reading; Renaming the digital book. [Weblog post]. Retrieved from http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2012/digital-reading-renaming-the-digital-book/ Lam, P. Lam, S.L., Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2009). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students’ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (1), 30-44.
- Learnsmart (2013). Retrieved from http://learnsmart.prod.customer.mcgraw-hill.com/ 30th ascilite Conference 2013 Proceedings
- McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M.J.W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning:Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf Michels, C.F. (2003). Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 135-148
- Nelson, M.R. (2008). E-books in higher education: Nearing the end of the era of hype? Educause Review, March/April, 40-56
- O’Brien, D. & Voss, S. (2011). Reading multimodally: What is afforded?. Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 55 (1). Doi: 10.598/JAAL.55.1.9 OnCampus Research (May 25, 2010). College students prefer print over digital textbooks. Retrieved from www.oncampusresearch.org
- Pols, A. (2012). Characterising affordances: The descriptions-of-affordances-model. J.K. Design Studies, 33,(2), 113-125. Retrieved from http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/characterising-affordances-thedescriptions-of-affordances-model-Xcp1lDQ51v
- Woody, D.W., Daniel, D.B., & Baker, C.A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers and Education, 55, 945-948. DOI:10.1016/J.compedu.2010.04.005Authors’details:DebborahSmith. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Jeffrey E. Brand. Email: email@example.com, Dr Shelley Kinash. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Please cite as: Smith, D., Brand, J.E., Kinash, S. (2013). Turn on the book: Using affordance theory to understand the adoption of digital textbooks by university lecturers. In H. Carter, M. Gosper and J. Hedberg (Eds.), Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney. (pp.812-820)
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.