Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry
ECTAJTRD Volume 30, Number 4, ISSN 0148-5806
Five major differences between the rationalistic and naturalistic paradigms of inquiry are accounted for: the nature of reality; the nature of the inquirer-object relationship; the nature of truth statements; assumptions about causal relationships; and the role of values within disciplined inquiry. Thirty-one sources are appended. (EJS)
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1982). Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 30(4), 233.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Wanjira Kinuthia, Georgia State University, United States; Rabelani Dagada, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 7, No. 4 (October 2008) pp. 623–639
Ian J. Quitadamo & Abbie Brown, Washington State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (2001) pp. 1182–1188
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.