You are here:

Teacher Design Knowledge for Technology Enhanced Learning: An Ecological Framework for Investigating Assets and Needs
ARTICLE

, , ,

ISAIJLS Volume 43, Number 2, ISSN 0020-4277

Abstract

Despite the fact that teaching is increasingly referred to as a design science, teacher education programs devote relatively little time to developing expertise in the design of instruction, beyond lesson planning. Yet today's teachers not only plan lessons that incorporate existing classroom activities and instructional resources, they also design new learning activities and create their own (technology enhanced) learning materials. Different approaches have been tried to support pre- and in-service teacher design learning. Past efforts to develop teacher skills in design had limited success, probably due to poor alignment of traditional instructional design models with teachers' knowledge, needs and natural ways of engaging with design tasks. More recently, researchers have begun to investigate and develop ways to build on teacher expertise to support them in their design efforts. Yet to date, little has been done to capitalize on what is already understood about teachers as designers nor to draw on the wealth of literature on designers and designing outside the field of education. With the ultimate aim of supporting the work of teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning, this contribution synthesizes research on design from classical design fields, instructional design, and teachers' designing. These perspectives are brought together in an ecological framework that can be used by researchers to study teacher design knowledge and work across projects. This synthesis could also provide an articulated framework for developers and facilitators of teacher professional development programs for identifying key areas for support to teacher-designers in specific settings.

Citation

McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L. & Voogt, J. (2015). Teacher Design Knowledge for Technology Enhanced Learning: An Ecological Framework for Investigating Assets and Needs. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 43(2), 181-202. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Characteristics of learning environments at the boundary between school and work – A literature review

    Erica Bouw, Open University of the Netherlands; Ilya Zitter, HU University of Applied Sciences; Elly de Bruijn, Open University of the Netherlands

    Educational Research Review Vol. 26, No. 1 (February 2019) pp. 1–15

  2. Topics and Sequences in Experienced Teachers’ Instructional Planning: Addressing a ~30-year Literature Gap

    Mark Hofer & Judi Harris, William & Mary School of Education, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019 (Mar 18, 2019) pp. 2443–2452

  3. The Design Document as a Strategy for Making Design Thinking Visible: Innovating Practice and Embedding Technology

    Dawn Hathaway & Priscilla Norton, George Mason University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019 (Mar 18, 2019) pp. 1842–1849

  4. Primary Pre-service Teachers as Learning Designers of Collaborative Activities with ICT

    Adolfina Pérez Garcias, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain; Victoria I Marín Juarros, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany; Gemma Tur & Alexandra Lizana, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2018 (Jun 25, 2018) pp. 1094–1101

  5. TPCK and Initial teacher education: Insights on the development of pedagogical reasoning in TPCK-based instructional design (ID) practices

    Ottavia Trevisan & Marina De Rossi, University of Padova, Italy

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 2128–2132

  6. TPACK in language teaching: Implications for teacher education

    Joke Voogt, University of Amsterdam/ Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands; Susan McKenney, University of Twente, Netherlands; Bas Trimbos, Daniela Fasoglio, Petra Fisser & Allard Strijker, Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development, Netherlands; Shu-Ju Diana Tai, College of Arts and Law/School of International Education Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Taiwan; Anneke Smits, Roland Bruijn, Henk la Roi & Floor van Renssen, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands; Denise Crawford-Schmidt, Iowa State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 3121–3125

  7. TPACK in language teaching: Implications for teacher education

    Joke Voogt, University of Amsterdam/ Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands; Susan McKenney, University of Twente, Netherlands; Bas Trimbos, Daniela Fasoglio, Petra Fisser & Allard Strijker, Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development, Netherlands; Shu-Ju Diana Tai, College of Arts and Law/School of International Education Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Taiwan; Anneke Smits, Roland Bruijn, Henk la Roi & Floor van Renssen, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands; Denise Crawford-Schmidt, Iowa State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 3116–3120

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.