You are here:

Student Perceptions of Using Tablet Technology in Post-Secondary Classes
ARTICLE

,

CJLT Volume 39, Number 4, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education

Abstract

This paper assesses students' attitudes towards using tablets, such as the Apple iPad, in university classes. Tablets are found to be a substitute for laptop computers. Students initially expressed a great deal of optimism regarding the technology, and, although their views diminished slightly as they gained experience with using a tablet, their attitude towards the technology remained overwhelmingly positive. Most students experienced an easy transition from using a laptop to using a tablet. Furthermore, once students adopted the tablets in place of their laptops for in-class use, the types of tasks they performed with the tablets differed from the types of tasks they had previously performed with the laptop. Overall, the tablets reduced the incidence of off-task behaviour during lectures such as using chat and social networking applications.

Citation

Mang, C.F. & Wardley, L.J. (2013). Student Perceptions of Using Tablet Technology in Post-Secondary Classes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 39(4),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved December 11, 2018 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aguilar-Roca, N.M., Williams, A.E., & O’Dowd, D.K. (2012). The impact of laptop-free zones on student performance and attitudes in large lectures. Computers& Education, 59(4), 1300-1308.
  2. Barkhuus, L. (2005). Bring your own laptop unless you want to follow the lecture: Alternative communication in the classroom. Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting GroupWork, 140-143.
  3. Cismaru, R. & Cismaru, M. (2011). Laptop use during class: A review of Canadian universities. Journal of College Teaching& Learning, 10(11), 21-28.
  4. Eichenlaub, N., Gabel, L., Jakubek, D., McCarthy, G., & Wang, W. (2011, September). Project iPad: Investigating tablet integration in learning and libraries at Ryerson University. Computers In Libraries, 17-21.
  5. Fried, C.B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its eVects on student learning. Computers& Education, 50, 906-914.
  6. Fischman, J., & Keller, J. (2011). College Tech Goes Mobile. Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(1), 50.
  7. Gabriel, M.A., Campbell, B., Wiebe, S., MacDonald, R.J., & McAuley, A. (2012). The role of digital technologies in learning: Expectations of first year university students. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 38(1).
  8. Gawelek, M.A., Spataro, M., & Komarny, P. (2011). Mobile perspectives: On iPads why mobile?, EDUCAUSE Review, 46(2), 28-32.
  9. Goral, T. (2011, January). Take II Tablets. University Business, 46-49.
  10. Hembrooke, H. & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15 (1), 46-64.
  11. Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236-2243.
  12. Junco, R. & Cotten, S.R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers& Education, 59(2), 505-514.
  13. Kim, S.H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K.P. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education. AACE Journal, 14(1), 77-100.
  14. Lauricella, S., & Kay, R. (2010). Assessing laptop use in higher education classrooms: The Laptop Effectiveness Scale (LES). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 151-163.
  15. Mang, C.F., & Wardley, L.J. (2012). Effective adoption of tablets in post-secondary education: Recommendations based on a trial of iPads in university classes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 11, 301-317.
  16. Maxwell, N.G. (2007). From Facebook to Folsom Prison Blues: How banning laptops in the classroom made me a better law school teacher. Richmond Journal of Law& Technology, 14(2), 1-43.
  17. Percival, J. & Percival, N. (2009). A case of a laptop learning campus: How do technology choices affect perceptions?. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 173-186.
  18. Rossing, J.P., Miller, W.M., Cecil, A.K., & Stamper, S.E. (2012). ILearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1-26.
  19. Tanaka, P.P., Hawrylyshyn, K.A., & Macario, A. (2012). Use of tablet (iPad®) as a tool for teaching anesthesiology in an orthopedic rotation. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 62(2), 214-222.
  20. Vuojärvi, H., Isomäki, H., & Hynes, D. (2010). Domestication of a laptop on a wireless university campus: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 250-267.
  21. Weider, B. (2011). IPads could hinder teaching, professors say. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(28), A22-A23.
  22. Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., DePasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning, Computers& Education, 58(1), 365-374.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.