Determinants of digital inequality in universities: the case of Ecuador
Juan Torres-Diaz, Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja ; Josep Duart, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Volume 11, Number 3, ISSN 1826-6223 e-ISSN 1826-6223 Publisher: Italian e-Learning Association
The digital divide was initially defined by socioeconomic variables, mainly the level of family income, but now it focuses on how the Internet is used and is called digital inequality. In the case of universities, recent studies have pointed to the existence of patterns that are dependent on a variety of socioeconomic variables. This article analyses the effect that the level of family income, gender and age of students from five Ecuadorian universities has on Internet use for academic activities and entertainment purposes. In the procedure applied to a sample of 4,697 students, factor analysis was used to reduce the data, and multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the relationships. The results show that the higher the level of family income, the better the technology use for academic activities. Regarding entertainment, the level of income does not determine the intensity of technology use, though it does determine the types of tool that students use. With reference to gender, men have a greater tendency to use technology for entertainment, but there is no difference between genders when it comes to academic uses.
Torres-Diaz, J. & Duart, J. (2015). Determinants of digital inequality in universities: the case of Ecuador. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3),. Italian e-Learning Association.
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Inclusive digital online environments as a device for pedagogic differentiation: a taxonomy proposal
Angélica Monteiro & Carlinda Leite
Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 12, No. 4 (Sep 27, 2016)
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.