You are here:

Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches
ARTICLE

, , , Monash University

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 30, Number 4, ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Full Text

Abstract

Blended learning has been growing in popularity as it has proved to be an effective approach for accommodating an increasingly diverse student population whilst adding value to the learning environment through incorporation of online teaching resources. Despite this growing interest, there is ongoing debate about the definition of the concept of blended learning. As a result, teachers in higher education have developed different understandings of the term and different design approaches have evolved. Selecting the most appropriate design approach for a blended course is a major challenge for many teachers in higher education institutions who are new to the idea of blended learning. This paper aims to provide guidance to help teachers of traditional face-to-face courses in selecting the most appropriate approach to use when designing their blended courses. Firstly, it discusses the different definitions of the term blended learning and how they have resulted in a number of design approaches. It then classifies these approaches into: low-impact, medium-impact and high-impact blends according to the potential changes to the existing teaching program and student learning experience. Finally, it describes the benefits and the challenges of applying each approach and provides recommendations about when and how each approach should be used.

Citation

Alammary, A., Sheard, J. & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4),. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved February 26, 2021 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Amiel, T., & Orey, M. (2006). Do you have the time? Investigating online classroom workload. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35, 31-43.
  2. Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 9-21. Retrieved from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham2.htm
  3. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347-364.
  4. Bliuc, A.-M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R.A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 231-244. Doi:10.1016/J.iheduc.2007.08.001
  5. Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 165-178.
  6. Brunner, D.L. (2006). The potential of the hybrid course vis-à-vis online and traditional courses. Teaching Theology & Religion, 9, 229-235. Doi:10.1111/J.1467-9647.2006.00288.x
  7. Carman, J.M. (2002). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Retrieved from http://www.agilantlearning.com/pdf/Blended%20Learning%20Design.pdf
  8. Cennamo, K.S., Ross, J.D., & Ertmer, P.A. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
  9. Chen, W., & Looi, C. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 307-326.
  10. Cook, K., Owston, R., & Garrison, D.R. (2004). Blended learning practices at COHERE universities. Retrieved from http://www.yorku.ca/irlt/reports/BLtechnicalreportfinal.pdf
  11. Deperlioglu, O., & Kose, U. (2013). The effectiveness and experiences of blended learning approaches to computer programming education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21, 328-342.
  12. Duhaney, D.C. (2004). Blended learning in education,training, and development. Performance Improvement, 43(8), 35-38. Doi:10.1002/pfi.4140430810
  13. Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning, and the generations: Knowledge is power: No more. Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education. Retrieved from http://inspvirtual.mx/espm30/docentes/formdocente/jd2013/Julio_tlalpan/material_apoyo/blendedlearNing.pdf
  14. Ellis, R.A., Steed, A.F., & Applebee, A.C. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 312-335 http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/submission/index.php/AJET/index
  15. Ertmer, P.A, & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255284. Doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  16. Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105. Doi:10.1016/J.iheduc.2004.02.001
  17. Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Graham, C.R. (2009). Blended learning models. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 375-382. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Graham, C.R. (2012a). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Harriman, G. (2004). Blended learning. Retrieved from http://www.grayharriman.com/blended_learning.htm #1
  20. Hofmann, J. (2006). Why blended learning hasn't (yet) fulfilled its promises. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 27-40). San
  21. Huang, R., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Designing blended learning focused on knowledge category and learning activities. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 296-310). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  22. Kaleta, R., Garnham, C., & Aycock, A. (2005). Hybrid courses: Obstacles and solutions for faculty and students. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/03_72.pdf
  23. Kaleta, R., Skibba, K., & Joosten, T. (2007). Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses. In A.G. Picciano & C.D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended learning research perspectives (pp. 111-143). Needham,
  24. Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended e-learning. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Francis.
  25. McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 729-740.
  26. Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15-23. Doi:10.1016/J.iheduc.2012.12.001Newcombe,E.(2011,June).Awork in progress: Refining the “blend” of face-to-face and online instruction. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011, Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/38304
  27. Norberg, A., Dziuban, C.D, & Moskal, P.D. (2011). A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19, 207-216. Http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/oth
  28. Ocak, M.A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56, 689-699.
  29. Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-learning and Digital Media, 2, 17-26.
  30. Osguthorpe, R.T., & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 227-233.
  31. Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M. (2011). Good practice report: Blended learning. Sydney, NSW: the Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/47566/1/47566.pdf
  32. Picciano, A.G. (2009). Blending With Purpose: The Multimodal Model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology (RCET), 5(1), 4-14.
  33. Ragan, L. (2007). Teaching blended learning courses. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m15048/latest/?collection=col10453/latest
  34. Reeves, T.C. (2003). Storm clouds on the digital education horizon. Journal of Computing, 15(1), 3-26. Http://www.editlib.org/j/ISSN-1042-1726/
  35. Ross, B., & Gage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blending learning: Insight from WebCT and our customers in higher education. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 155-168). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  36. Sharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 64, 456-458. Http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/
  37. Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended elearning: A review of UK literature and practice. Retrieved from http://business.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/research/literature_reviews/blended_elearning_full_review.pdf
  38. Silverwood, T. (2006). Blended Learning Made Easy. Http://www.chs.nihonu.ac.jp/institute/human/kiyou/74/10.pdf
  39. Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2008). Success factors for blended learning. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008. Http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/stacey.pdf
  40. Torrisi-Steele, G., & Davis, G. (2000). “A website for my subject”: The experiences of some academics’ engagement with educational designers in a team based approach to developing online learning materials. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16, 283-301.
  41. Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on ELearning (IJEL), 6, 81. Http://www.editlib.org/j/IJEL/
  42. Verkroost, M.J., Meijerink, L., Lintsen, H., & Veen, W. (2008). Finding a balance in dimensions of blended learning. International Journal on E-Learning (IJEL), 7, 499522. Http://www.editlib.org/j/IJEL/
  43. Walters, B. (2008, August 12). Blended learning-classroom with on-line. The CALSCA Online Magazine. Retrieved from http://calsca.com/Writings/walters_blended_learning.htm
  44. Westbrook, K. (2008). The beginning of the end for blended learning? IATEFL CALL Review 2008. Retrieved from http://www.psa.eu.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/DeathOfBlendedLearning.pdf
  45. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, Pp. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 173-207.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections