You are here:

Learning Anywhere, Anytime: Student Motivators for M-learning
ARTICLE

, Curtin University, Australia ; , , Murdoch University, Australia

JITE-Research Volume 12, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Abstract

This paper documents the outcomes of a study that focused on identifying what motivates students to use mobile devices for learning and to engage in m-learning. An outcome of this study was to provide a better understanding of what educators should consider when adapting their course for mobile learners. The research included seven classes from three Australian universities. The students in this study used laptops or tablet PCs, and in three of the classes, these were provided by the university as part of a laptop/tablet program. The findings indicated that mobility was the key motivator for the use of laptops, and the learning tasks that students found to be most motivating involved accessing information, authoring (e.g., writing, blogging, note taking) and communication.

Citation

Martin, R., Mcgill, T.J. & Sudweeks, F. (2013). Learning Anywhere, Anytime: Student Motivators for M-learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 51-67. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Boekaerts, M. (2001). Context sensitivity: Activated motivational beliefs, current concerns and emotional arousal. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in learning context: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 17-31). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  2. Breen, R., & Lindsay, R. (2002). Different disciplines require different motivations for student success. Research in Higher Education, 43(6), 693-725.
  3. Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). Disruptive technologies, pedagogical innovation. What's new: Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology. Computers& Education, 50(2), 511-524.
  4. Corbeil, R., Pan, C., Sullivan, M., & Butler, J. (2007). Enhancing e-learning through m-learning: Are you ready to go mobile? In C. Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education (SITE) International Conference 2007 (pp. 273-280). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  5. Demb, A., Erickson, D., & Hawkins-Wilding, S. (2004). The laptop alternative: Student reactions and strategic implications. Computers& Education, 43(4), 383-401. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2003.08.008
  6. De Vaus, D.A. (2002). Surveys in social research. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen& Unwin.
  7. Eriksson, M.J., Vuojärvi, H., & Ruokamo, H. (2009). Laptop computers and wireless university campus networks: Is flexibility and effectiveness improved? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 322-335. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/eriksson.html
  8. Garrison, D.R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.
  9. Gulek, J.C., & Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2), 1-39.
  10. Hall, M., & Elliott, K.M. (2003). Diffusion of technology into the teaching process: Strategies to encourage faculty members to embrace the laptop environment. Journal of Education for Business, 78(6), 301-307.
  11. Herrington, J., Herrington, A., Mantei, J., Olney, I., & Ferry, B. (2009). Using mobile technologies to develop new ways of teaching and learning. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education. (pp. 1-14).
  12. Keller, J.M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185.
  13. Kim, S.H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K.P. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education. AACE Journal, 14(1), 77-100.
  14. Klein, H.J., Noe, R.A., & Wang, C. (2006). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: The impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 59, 665-702.
  15. Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2008). Situated mobile learning in higher education. In C.J. Bonk, M.M. Lee, & T. Reynolds (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008. (pp. 1745-1750). Las Vegas, NV: AACE.
  16. MacCallum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2010). Resistance to the inclusion of mobile tools in the classroom: The impact of attitudes and variables on the adoption of mobile learning In R. Guy (Ed.), Mobile learning: Pilot projects and initiatives (pp. 143-166). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.
  17. Martin, A.J. (2006). The relationship between teachers' perceptions of student motivation and engagement and teachers' enjoyment of and confidence in teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 73-93.
  18. Newhouse, C.P. (2001). A follow-up study of students using portable computers at a secondary school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 209-219.
  19. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J.L. (2005). Educating the Net Generation (pp. 264). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf Olney, I., Herrington, J., & Verenikina, I. (2009). Digital storytelling using iPods. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 36-44). Wollongong, NSW, Australia: University of Wollongong.
  20. Oloruntoba, R. (2006). Mobile learning environments: A conceptual overview. In A. Brown (Ed.), Proceedings of Learning on the Move: Online Learning and Teaching Conference 2006 (pp. 1-9). Brisbane,
  21. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  22. Roberts, G.R. (2005). Technology and learning expectations of the Net Generation. In D. Oblinger& J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation. (pp. 3.1-3.7). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
  23. Roblyer, M.D., & Doering, A.H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching (5th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
  24. Sha, L., Looi, C.K., Chen, W., & Zhang, B.H. (2012). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 366-378.
  25. Schunk, D.H., Pintrich, P.R., & Meece, J.L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  26. Seifert, T.L., & O'Keefe, B.A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 81-92.
  27. Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1-12.
  28. Waite, W.M., Jackson, M.H., Diwan, A., & Leonardi, P.M. (2004). Student culture vs groupwork in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 1-16. Doi: 10.1.1.4.7900
  29. Wolters, C.A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goals orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236250.
  30. Wolters, C.A., Yu, S.L., & Pintrich, P.R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90015-1

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.