Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality
Journal of Research in Science Teaching Volume 45, Number 3, ISSN 0022-4308
The national science standards, along with prominent researchers, call for increased focus on scientific argumentation in the classroom. Over the past decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online science learning environments to support these opportunities for scientific argumentation. Assessing the quality of dialogic argumentation, however, has proven challenging. Existing analytic frameworks assess dialogic argumentation in terms of the nature of students' discourse, formal argumentation structure, interactions, and epistemic forms of reasoning. Few frameworks, however, connect these assessments to conceptual quality. We present an analytic framework for assessing argumentation in online science learning environments that relates levels of opposition with discourse moves, use of grounds, and conceptual quality. We then apply the proposed framework to students' dialogic argumentation within a representative online science learning environment to investigate the framework's potential affordances as well as to assess issues of reliability and appropriateness. The results suggest that the framework offers significant affordances and that it also offers high interrater reliability for trained coders. The applicability of the framework for offline contexts and future extensions of the framework are discussed in light of these results. (Contains 11 figures and 4 tables.)
Clark, D.B. & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Computers & Education Vol. 139, No. 1 (October 2019) pp. 191–206
Understanding Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussion: Use of a Scaffolded, Audio-based Argumentation Activity
Eunjung Oh, Department of Education Policy, Organization and Leadership University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Hyun Kim, Department of Professional Learning and Innovation Georgia College and State University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 5 (Sep 26, 2016)
Alexandru Spatariu, Georgetown College, KY, United States; Denise Winsor, University of Memphis, United States; Bobby Hoffman, University of Central Florida, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 2106–2116
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.