You are here:

Impacts of Student Categorization of Their Online Discussion Contributions
ARTICLE

,

American Journal of Distance Education Volume 21, Number 2, ISSN 0892-3647

Abstract

This study examined the impacts of online graduate students categorizing their online discussion contributions according to an instructor's criteria. Student messages before and after this categorizing activity were unitized by terminal punctuation; classified for function, skill, and level; and analyzed based on Henri and Rigault's (1996) content analysis framework. There was an unexpected decrease in the quantity of messages following the treatment. Even more surprising was the decrease in four quality measures of cognitive dialogue: percentage cognitive unit among four functions, percentage inference and percentage analysis or elaboration (or in-depth clarification) among five cognitive skills, and percentage high-level processing. This treatment seems to have inhibited cognitive dialogue, although qualitative data suggested that there may have been some advantages for some students.

Citation

Flowers, J. & Cotton, S.E. (2007). Impacts of Student Categorization of Their Online Discussion Contributions. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(2), 93-104. Retrieved May 22, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 18, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.