
Motivational Influences in Distance Education: The Role of Self-Regulation
PROCEEDINGS
Chih-Yuan Sun, University of Southern California, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore motivational influences, especially the effect of self-regulation, on distance education. Although distance education provides flexibility, convenience, and a location-free learning environment, research has shown that distance education students lack discipline to self-regulate themselves in the learning process. In the literature review section, the author reviews articles and theories based on Dembo and Eaton’s six dimensions of behaviors that affect students’ self-regulation. The findings show that the use of strategies, such as interaction, facilitates distance education learners’ self-regulation and increases their motivation to learn online.
Citation
Sun, C.Y. (2008). Motivational Influences in Distance Education: The Role of Self-Regulation. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4419-4422). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 11, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28999/.
© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
- Byers, A. (2000). Interaction: The key to successful distance learning. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.
- Dembo, M.H., & Eaton, M.J. (2000). Self-regulation of academic learning in middle-level schools. Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 473-490.
- Dembo, M.H., Junge, L.G., & Lynch, R. (2006). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Implications for web-based education. In H.O'Neil (Ed.), Web-based learning: theory, research, and practice. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Guzley, R.M., Avanzino, S., & Bor, A. (2001). Simulated computer-mediated/video-interactive distance learning: A test of motivation, interaction satisfaction, delivery, learning& Perceived effectiveness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(3).
- Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3).
- Lee, J.-K., & Lee, W.-K. (2008). The relationship of e-learner's self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-Learning environmental quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 32-47.
- Mason, C.Y., & Dodds, R. (2005). Bridging the digital divide: schools must find ways to provide equal access to technology for all students. Principal, 84(4), 24-30.
- McMahon, M., & Oliver, R. (2001). Promoting self-regulated learning in an on-line environment. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Ormrod, J.E. (2006). Educational psychology: Developing learners (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Parker, A. (1999). Interaction in distance education: The critical conversation. Educational Technology Review(12), 13-17.
- Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education: Institute for Higher Education Policy Washington DC.
- Pintrich, P.R., Schunk, D.H., & Meece, J.L. (2008). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
- Schunk, D.H. (2004). Learning theories: an educational perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
- Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Seaman, D.F., & Fellenz, R.A. (1993). Effective strategies for teaching adults (2 ed.). New York, NY: Merrill.
- Tuckman, B.W. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes. Computers& Education, 49(2), 414-422.
- Wagner, E.D. (1998). Interaction strategies for online training designs. Paper presented at the Distance Learning '98. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching& Learning.
- Wang, S.-L., & Lin, S.S.J. (2007). The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 600-612.
- Whipp, J.L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5-22.
- Wolters, C.A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179-187.
- Wood, P.A. (2001). The U.S. Department of Education and student financial aid for distance education: An update. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington, DC.
- Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
- Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-72.
- Zimmerman, B.J., & Pons, M.M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
- Zimmerman, B.J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In G.D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 105-125). San Diego, CA:
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References