You are here:

Effects of Personal Learning Devices and their Usage on Student Learning and Engagement

, , North Dakota State University, United States

JCMST Volume 37, Number 3, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of using Personal Learning Devices as interactive white boards on students' learning and engagement. The study took place in an Algebra 2 classroom during the 2015-2016 school year. Baseline scores were gathered in the fall of 2015 and control and experimental scores were gathered in the spring of 2016. The control group used traditional individual white boards to work problems in class, where the experimental group used touch-screen tablets to work the same problems in class. The experimental group randomly had their work projected anonymously on the board. Gain scores were measured based on pre-implementation and post-implementation quiz and test scores for both control and experimental groups using Mann-Whitney U-Tests. They were also compared with pre- and post-implementation mean scores and other descriptive statistics and student opinions on the study. For most scores there was no significant difference in gain scores between control and experimental groups.

Citation

Labrensz, J. & Ayebo, A. (2018). Effects of Personal Learning Devices and their Usage on Student Learning and Engagement. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 37(3), 193-216. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 21, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Basham, M. D. (2012, January 1). Do Ubiquitous Laptop Initiatives Decrease the High School Dropout Rate?. ProQuest LLC.
  2. Brogdon, S. G. (2008). Relationships between perceptions of personal ownership of laptop computers and attitudes toward school. ProQuest LLC.
  3. Booth, J., Lange, K., Koedinger, K., & Newton, K. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 24-34.
  4. Boyce, C. J., Mishra, C., Halverson, K. L., & Thomas, A. K. (2014). Getting Students Outside: Using Technology as a Way to Stimulate Engagement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 815-826.
  5. Carini, R., Kuh, G., & Klein, S. (2014). Student Engagement And Student Learning: Testing The Linkages*. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
  6. Cravey, R.T. (2008). An analysis of the relationship of educational technology implementation level and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation).
  7. Fister, K. R., & McCarthy, M. L. (2008). Mathematics instruction and the tablet PC. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.
  8. Galligan, L., Hobohm, C., & Loch, B. (2012). Tablet Technology to Facilitate Improved Interaction and Communication with Students Studying Mathematics at a Distance. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(4), 363-385.
  9. Galligan, L., Loch, B., McDonald, C., & Taylor, J. A. (2010). The Use of Tablet and Related Technologies in Mathematics Teaching. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 24(1), 38-51.
  10. Gurung (2012). Using mini-whiteboards to transform classroom practice | Stuff I’m learning at school [Web log post]. (2012, October 22). Retrieved from http://stuffimlearning.azurewebsites.net/2012/10/using-mini-whiteboardsto-support-teaching-and-learning/
  11. Hopkins, G. (2007). Education World: Whiteboards Stimulate Student Learning. Retrieved from http://www.educationworld.com/a_lesson/lesson/lesson251. Shtml
  12. Jamison, M.A. (2008). The effects of the ubiquitous computing environment on student achievement and teacher perceptions (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved July 15, 2015, from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database.
  13. Kuh, G., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., & Kinzie, J. (2008). Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540-563.
  14. Koile, K., & Singer, D. (2008). Assessing the Impact of a Tablet-PC-based Classroom Interaction System. N Proceedings of Workshop on the Impact of Pen-Based Technology on Education.
  15. Le Ber, J., Lombardo, N., & Quilter, J. (2008). Tablet PC Use Enhances Teaching and Student Learning. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 17-31.
  16. Loch, B., Galligan, L., Hobohm, C., & McDonald, C. (2011). Learner-Centred Mathematics and Statistics Education Using Netbook Tablet PCs. International Journal Of Mathematical Education In Science And Technology, 42(7), 939-949.
  17. Mueller, P., & Oppenheimer, D. (2014). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science. New Study Reveals U.S. Students Believe Tablets Are Game Changers in Learning and Student Engagement. Pearson. (September 8, 2014). Retrieved July 3, 2015, from http://www.pearsoned.com/news/new-study-reveals-u-s-students-believe-tablets-are-game-changers-in-learning-and-student-engage-
  18. Smith, L. A. (2012, January 1). Leveling the Playing Field: Using a One-to-One Laptop Initiative to Close the Achievement Gap. ProQuest LLC.
  19. Zhang, M., Trussell, R. P., Gallegos, B., & Asam, R. R. (2015). Using Math Apps for Improving Student Learning: An Exploratory Study in an Inclusive Fourth Grade Classroom. Techtrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 59(2), 32-39.
  20. Zucker, A. A., & Hug, S. T. (2007). A Study of the 1:1 Laptop Program at the Denver School of Science & Technology. Online Submission.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.