You are here:

Drop-out, Retention, Satisfaction and Attainment of Online Learners of Dutch in Adult education

, , , Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Belgium

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 17, Number 3, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Understanding reasons for drop-out, factors contributing to student satisfaction and strategies for enhancing student retention is fundamental to the success of online (language) courses. This study examines drop-out rates, student satisfaction, retention rates and attainment in fully online elementary-level courses for Dutch as a second language (L2) in Flanders. Results show that drop-out rates are highly “front-loaded” and that success in the A1 level course is a good predictor for success in the subsequent level. Retention strongly increases after the first module. Student-tutor interaction is a key element in student satisfaction that deserves attention from instructional designers, policy makers and educators.

Citation

De Paepe, L., Zhu, C. & DePryck, K. (2018). Drop-out, Retention, Satisfaction and Attainment of Online Learners of Dutch in Adult education. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(3), 303-323. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 20, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).
  2. Anderson, E. (2006). Retention for Rookies. Presentation at the National Conference on Student Retention, San Diego.
  3. Andrade, M.S., & Bunker, E.L. (2009). A model for self-regulated distance language learning. Distance Education 30(1), 47–61.
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 1–26.
  5. Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  6. Blake, R., & Delforge, A. (2007). Online Language Learning: The Case of Spanish Without Walls. In B. Lafford & R. Salaberry, The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 127–147). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
  7. Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education 46, 39–42.
  8. Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10(2), 314–325.
  9. Dodge, T. M., Mitchell, M. F., & Mensch, J. M. (2009). Student retention in athletic training education programs. Journal of athletic training 44(2), 197–207.
  10. Dolan, K. (2008). Comparing Modes of Instruction: The Relative Efficacy of On-Line and In-Person Teaching for Student Learning. PS: Political Science and Politics 41(2), 387–391.
  11. Dupin-Bryant, P. (2004). Pre-entry variables related to retention in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 18(4), 199–206.
  12. Frydenberg, J. (2007). Persistence in university continuing education online classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8(3), 1–15.
  13. Gillis, C. (2007). Leaving Seats Empty: Exploring Student Attrition in an Undergraduate Health Sciences Program. Mount Saint Vincent University.
  14. Heyman E. (2010). Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs: A Delphi study (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ProQuest document ID: 748309429).
  15. Hurd, S. (2006). Towards a better understanding of the dynamic role of the distance language learner: Learner perceptions of personality, motivation, roles and approaches. Distance Education 27(3), 303–329.
  16. Kahu, E. R., Stephens, C., Leach, L. & Zepke, N. (2013). The engagement of mature distance students. Higher Education Research & Development 32(5), 1–14.
  17. Kember, D. (1989). A longitudinal-process model of drop-out from distance education. The Journal of Higher Education 60(3), 278–301.
  18. Kim, J., Kwon, Y. & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education 57(2), 1512–1520.
  19. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers and Education 48(2), 185–204.
  20. Liu, S. Y., Gomez, J., & Cherng-Jyh, Y. (2009). Community college online course retention and final grade: Predictability of social presence. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 8(2), 165–182.
  21. Liu, S., Gomez, J., Khan, B., & Yen, C.-J. (2007). Toward a learner-oriented community college online course dropout framework. International Journal on E-Learning 6(4), 519–542. Available from EdITLib Digital Library. (21789)
  22. Moore, M. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  23. Morpeth, R. (2014). Supporting students for success in online and distance education (Third Edition), Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 29(3), 258–260.
  24. Park, J. H. (2007). Factors related to learner dropout in online learning. Proceedings
  25. of the 2007 Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference, Indianapolis, 251–258.
  26. Poellhuber, B., Chomienne, M., & Karsenti, T. (2008). The effect of peer collaboration and collaborative learning on self-efficacy and persistence in a learner-paced continuous intake model. Journal of Distance Education 22(3), 41–62.
  27. Rovai A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education 6, 1–16.
  28. Schneider, M. & Yin, L. (2011). The hidden costs of community colleges. American Institute for Research, available at www.air.org .
  29. Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: Are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 28, 105–119.
  30. Sun, S. Y. H. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance Education 35(1), 18–42.
  31. Tello, S. F. (2007). An analysis of student persistence in online education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 3(3), 47–62.
  32. The Education Trust (2009). Subprime opportunity. Retrieved from http://edtrust.org/sites/edtrust.org/files/publications/files/Subprime_report.pdf
  33. Tinto,V. (1975). Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research. Review of Educational Research 45, 89–125.
  34. Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(4), 105–118.
  35. White, C. (2014). The distance learning of foreign languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching 47(4), 538–553.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.