You are here:

Evaluation of World Wide Web Delivered University Courseware: Creating an Instrument Appropriate for a New Course Delivery Medium
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , West Texas A&M University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, ISBN 978-1-880094-37-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Research was performed during the 1998 and 1999 calendar years that had as its purpose the development and validation of a course/instructor evaluation instrument specifically for use with graduate and undergraduate courses delivered online via the World Wide Web. The primary goal of the study was to develop an instrument that would collect valid perception data from students at West Texas A&M University concerning technology of delivery, course content, and instructor related aspects of courseware delivered via the Internet. To this end an instrument was developed using the input of two panels of university faculty, administrators, and staff, and repeated pilot studies to collect data on the validity and reliability of the instrument. Feedback received from the expert panels, short and long-term pilot studies, and analysis of the collected data provide preliminary evidence to support the validity and reliability of this Internet delivered course-specific evaluation instrument.

Citation

Izat, J., McKinzie, L., Mize, C. & McCallie, T. (2000). Evaluation of World Wide Web Delivered University Courseware: Creating an Instrument Appropriate for a New Course Delivery Medium. In D. Willis, J. Price & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2000--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 189-193). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 25, 2020 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References