You are here:

Faculty Involvement in Internet Based Learning: Why Would They Ever Do That?
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Georgia, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-54-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Colleges and universities are continually expanding the number of Internet-Based Leaning (IBL) environments as part of their educational programs. This article focuses on the motivating and demotivating factors that lead faculty members to participate or not participate in IBL. Included in the article are discussions of the intrinsic and extrinsic motivating factors found in faculty member's perceptions of the IBL arena. Also discussed are the concepts of incentives and disincentives, which play a major role in IBL engagement. Finally, the article closes with a conversation of the needs that must be provided to faculty to ease their transition into IBL.

Citation

Deaton, B. & Singleton, E. (2004). Faculty Involvement in Internet Based Learning: Why Would They Ever Do That?. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2004--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 566-571). Washington, DC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 17, 2019 from .

© 2004 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, interactive, and reflective learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3 (2), 181190 .
  2. Cyrs, T. E. (1997). Competence in teaching at a distance. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 15-18 . Dillon, C. L., & Walsh, S. M. (1992). Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 6 (3), 5 -21 .
  3. Fender, D.L. (2001, April). Student and faculty issues in distance education. Paper presented at the Mid-sou th Instructional Technology Conference, Murfreesboro, TN.
  4. Flowers, J. (2001). Online learning needs in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 13(1), 17-30 . Franklin, T., & Blankson, J. (2001). Together and alone: The instructional, technical, and psychological outcomes of faculty building online courses. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Orlando, FL.
  5. Gold, S. (2001). A co nstructivist approach to online training for online teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (1), 35-57 .
  6. Jones, E. T., Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Dooley, K. E. (2002). Faculty philosophical position towards distance education: Competency , value, and educational technology support. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5 (1).
  7. King, F. B., Young, M. F., Drivere-Richmond, K., & Schrader, P. G. (2001). Defining distance learning and distance education. Educational Technology Review, 9 (1).
  8. Klemm, W. R. (2000). What's wrong with on -line discussions and how to fix it. Paper presented at the WebNet 2000 World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings, San Antonio, TX.
  9. Lan, J. (2001). Web -based instruction for education faculty: A needs assessment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 385-399.
  10. Lee, J. (2002). Faculty and administrator perceptions of instructional support for distance education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 27-45 .
  11. Lefoe, G., Gunn, C., & Hedberg, J. (2002). Recommendations for teaching in a distributed learning environment: The students' perspective. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 40-56 .
  12. Lumsden, L. (1999). Student Motivation: Cultivating a Love of Learning . Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
  13. Milheim, W. (2001). Faculty and administrative strategies for the effective implementation of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 535-542 .
  14. O'Quinn, L., & Corry, M. (2002). Factors that deter faculty from participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, V(4).
  15. Olcott, D., & Wright, S. J. (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in postsecondary distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9 (3), 5 -17 .
  16. Pachnowski, L. M., & Jurczyk, J. P. (2003). Perceptions of faculty on the effect of distance learning technology on faculty preparation time. Online journal of distance learning administration, 6 (3).
  17. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
  18. Parker, A. (2003). Motivation and incentives for distance faculty. Online journal of distance learning administration, 6 (3).
  19. Research on faculty and institutions. (2002). ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(4), 55-75 . Rumble, G. (2001). Re-inventing distance education, 1971-2001. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(1 - 2), 31-43 .
  20. Schifter, C. C. (2000). Faculty participation in distance education: a factor analysis of motivators and inhibitors. Paper presented at the National University Teleconferencing Consortium, Toronto.
  21. Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Persichitte, K. A. (2000). Differential skills and compet encies required of faculty teaching distance education courses. International Journal of Educational Technology, 2 (1).
  22. Thach, E. C. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 57-79 .
  23. Wolcott, L. L. (1998). Faculty issues pertaining to institutional support and reward practices in distance education. American Educational Research Association: San Diego, CA.
  24. Wolcott, L. L. (2003). Dynamics of faculty participation in distance education: Motivations, incentives, and rewards. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 549-565). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read