You are here:

assessment

Compiled by Maria Boubouka

Favorite
  • E-mail
  • Tags

    • ExplaNet: A Collaborative Learning Tool and Hybrid Recommender System for Student-Authored Explanations

      Masters, J., Madhyastha, T. & Shakouri, A. (2008). ExplaNet: A Collaborative Learning Tool and Hybrid Recommender System for Student-Authored Explanations. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), 51-74. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Reframing Assessment: Using social software to collect and organise learning

      Bartlett-Bragg, A. (2008). Reframing Assessment: Using social software to collect and organise learning. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4020-4024). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Integrating Peer evaluation of teaching and student evaluation for online instruction

      Yen, C.J., Corry, M., Ianacone, R. & Tu, C.H. (2003). Integrating Peer evaluation of teaching and student evaluation for online instruction. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2003--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 535-540). Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Examining Assessment of Collaborative Projects in Online Courses: Standards and Measures for Evaluating Wiki Collaborations

      Pai, D. & Leong, P. (2009). Examining Assessment of Collaborative Projects in Online Courses: Standards and Measures for Evaluating Wiki Collaborations. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron & C. Xin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2009--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 3037-3044). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Peer Evaluation in Blended Team Project-Based Learning; What Do Students Find Important?

      Lee, H.J. (2009). Peer Evaluation in Blended Team Project-Based Learning; What Do Students Find Important?. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron & C. Xin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2009--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2838-2842). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Methods for Formative Assessment of Online Courses

      McGinty, D. (2007). Methods for Formative Assessment of Online Courses. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2007--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 379-386). Quebec City, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Onscreen Marking Support for Formative Assessment

      Heinrich, E. & Lawn, A. (2004). Onscreen Marking Support for Formative Assessment. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1985-1992). Lugano, Switzerland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Negotiating the Teaching-Assessment Cycle in Writing Programs with XML

      Desmet, C. & Cummings, R. (2004). Negotiating the Teaching-Assessment Cycle in Writing Programs with XML. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2004--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 274-279). Washington, DC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Technology Options for Assessment Purposes and Quality Graduate Outcomes

      Hamilton, M. & Howell, S. (2006). Technology Options for Assessment Purposes and Quality Graduate Outcomes. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 904-911). Orlando, FL USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Examining Assessment in Online Instructional Development Practicums: The Case for Learning Contracts

      Leong, P. & Boulay, R. (2009). Examining Assessment in Online Instructional Development Practicums: The Case for Learning Contracts. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2937-2945). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Developing Metacognition through Student Contracts

      McMahon, M. & Luca, J. (2005). Developing Metacognition through Student Contracts. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3260-3268). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Assessment Strategies for Global Learning: I Theory

      Rimmington, G., O'Reilly, M., Gibson, K. & Gordon, D. (2003). Assessment Strategies for Global Learning: I Theory. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2487-2490). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Collaborative Mode Complex Assessment Tasks in Authentic Context: Theoretical Background, Internet Implementation and Validation

      Lesage, M., Riopel, M. & Raîche, G. (2010). Collaborative Mode Complex Assessment Tasks in Authentic Context: Theoretical Background, Internet Implementation and Validation. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2010--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1096-1105). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • The Impact of an E-Learning Environment on Students’ Self and Peer Assessment.

      Callaert, H. (2002). The Impact of an E-Learning Environment on Students’ Self and Peer Assessment. In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2002--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2561-2562). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Using feedback to enhance collaborative learning: an exploratory study concerning the added value of self- and peer-assessment by first-year students in a blended learning lecture

      Griesbaum, J. & Görtz, M. (2010). Using feedback to enhance collaborative learning: an exploratory study concerning the added value of self- and peer-assessment by first-year students in a blended learning lecture. International Journal on E-Learning, 9(4), 481-503. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Learning and Assessment in IT-based Environments: Design Principles for Hybrid Courses in Higher Education

      Dori, J., Levin-Peled, R. & Kali, Y. (2006). Learning and Assessment in IT-based Environments: Design Principles for Hybrid Courses in Higher Education. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2006--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1933-1939). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Getting Them To See The Light – Leveraging Technology For The Peer Evaluation Process

      Palsole, S. & Helms, K. (2004). Getting Them To See The Light – Leveraging Technology For The Peer Evaluation Process. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2004--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2873-2875). Washington, DC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Just-in-Time Assessments: Tools & Techniques to Promote Student Reflection, Deeper Thinking, and Long-term Knowledge Retention in the Online Classroom

      Samuel, J. & Hinson, J. (2009). Just-in-Time Assessments: Tools & Techniques to Promote Student Reflection, Deeper Thinking, and Long-term Knowledge Retention in the Online Classroom. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron & C. Xin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2009--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1911-1916). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • A Generic View on Web-Supported Peer-Evaluation

      Derntl, M. (2006). A Generic View on Web-Supported Peer-Evaluation. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1809-1816). Orlando, FL USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    • Improving Experiment Project Evaluation through Web-based Self- and Peer Assessment

      Lin, C.S., Chang, K.E., Lee, C.L. & Sung, Y.T. (2002). Improving Experiment Project Evaluation through Web-based Self- and Peer Assessment. In D. Willis, J. Price & N. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2002--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2432-2434). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Download CoursePack Download CoursePack & Close Window